Literature DB >> 10050853

Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern.

S Nishida1, A Johnston.   

Abstract

After adaptation of the visual system to motion of a pattern in a particular direction, a static pattern appears to move in the opposite direction-the motion aftereffect (MAE). It is thought that the MAE is not accompanied by a shift in perceived spatial position of the pattern being viewed, providing psychophysical evidence for a dissociation of the neural processing of motion and position that complements anatomical and physiological evidence of functional specialization in primate and human visual cortex. However, here we measure the perceived orientation of a static windmill pattern after adaptation to rotary motion and find a gradual shift in orientation in the direction of the illusory rotation, though at a rate much lower than the apparent rotation speed. The orientation shift, which started to decline within a few seconds, could persist longer than the MAE, and disappeared when the MAE was nulled by physical motion of the windmill pattern. Our results indicate that the representation of the position of spatial pattern is dynamically updated by neurons involved in the analysis of motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10050853     DOI: 10.1038/17600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  43 in total

1.  The influence of visual motion on perceived position.

Authors:  David Whitney
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  The influence of visual motion on fast reaching movements to a stationary object.

Authors:  David Whitney; David A Westwood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Flexible retinotopy: motion-dependent position coding in the visual cortex.

Authors:  David Whitney; Herbert C Goltz; Christopher G Thomas; Joseph S Gati; Ravi S Menon; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  A new look at Op art: towards a simple explanation of illusory motion.

Authors:  Johannes M Zanker; Robin Walker
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-03-16

5.  Velocity of motion across the skin influences perception of tactile location.

Authors:  Elizabeth H L Nguyen; Janet L Taylor; Jack Brooks; Tatjana Seizova-Cajic
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Visual motion due to eye movements helps guide the hand.

Authors:  David Whitney; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Motion distorts perceived position without awareness of motion.

Authors:  David Whitney
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Motion in depth from interocular velocity differences revealed by differential motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Julian Martin Fernandez; Bart Farell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Spatial and temporal properties of the illusory motion-induced position shift for drifting stimuli.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Saumil S Patel; Harold E Bedell; Ozgur Yilmaz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Second-order motion without awareness: passive adaptation to second-order motion produces a motion aftereffect.

Authors:  David Whitney; David W Bressler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.