Literature DB >> 12736237

Nondominant arm advantages in load compensation during rapid elbow joint movements.

Leia B Bagesteiro1, Robert L Sainburg.   

Abstract

This study was designed to examine interlimb asymmetries in responding to unpredictable changes in inertial loads, which have implications for our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying handedness. Subjects made repetitive single joint speed constrained 20 degrees elbow flexion movements, while the arm was supported on a horizontal, frictionless, air-jet system. On random trials, a 2-kg mass was attached to the arm splint prior to the "go" signal. Subjects were not given explicit information about the mass prior to movement nor were they able to view their limb or the mass. Accordingly, muscle activity, recorded prior to peak tangential finger acceleration, was the same for loaded and baseline trials. After this point, substantial changes in muscle activity occurred. In both limbs, the load compensation response was associated with a reduction in extensor muscle activity, resulting in a prolonged flexion phase of motion. For the nondominant arm, this resulted in effective load compensation, such that no differences in final position accuracy occurred between loaded and baseline trials. However, the dominant arm response also included a considerable increase in flexor muscle activity. This substantially prolonged the flexor acceleration phase of motion, relative to that of the nondominant arm. As a result, the dominant arm overcompensated the effects of the load, producing a large and systematic overshoot of final position. These results indicate more effective load compensation responses for the nondominant arm; supporting a specialized role of the nondominant arm/hemisphere system in sensory feedback mediated error correction mechanisms. The results also suggest that specialization of the dominant arm system for controlling limb and task dynamics is specifically related to feedforward control mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12736237     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00189.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  80 in total

1.  Critical neural substrates for correcting unexpected trajectory errors and learning from them.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Robert L Sainburg; Kathleen Y Haaland
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Interlimb differences in control of movement extent.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Sydney Y Schaefer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Relationship of diminished interjoint coordination after stroke to hand path consistency.

Authors:  Geetanjali Gera; Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira Freitas; John Peter Scholz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Handedness and index finger movements performed on a small touchscreen.

Authors:  Tomoko Aoki; Gil Rivlis; Marc H Schieber
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Asymmetric interference in left-handers during bimanual movements reflects switch in lateralized control characteristics.

Authors:  Florian A Kagerer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Differential influence of vision and proprioception on control of movement distance.

Authors:  Leia B Bagesteiro; Fabrice R Sarlegna; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Interlimb transfer of load compensation during rapid elbow joint movements.

Authors:  Leia B Bagesteiro; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Does hand dominance affect the use of motor abundance when reaching to uncertain targets?

Authors:  Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira Freitas; John Peter Scholz
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  Effect of auditory feedback differs according to side of hemiparesis: a comparative pilot study.

Authors:  Johanna V G Robertson; Thomas Hoellinger; Påvel Lindberg; Djamel Bensmail; Sylvain Hanneton; Agnès Roby-Brami
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Separation of visual and motor workspaces during targeted reaching results in limited generalization of visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Yuming Lei; Michelle J Johnson; Jinsung Wang
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.