Literature DB >> 26683065

Handedness and index finger movements performed on a small touchscreen.

Tomoko Aoki1, Gil Rivlis2, Marc H Schieber3.   

Abstract

Many studies of right/left differences in motor performance related to handedness have employed tasks that use arm movements or combined arm and hand movements rather than movements of the fingers per se, the well-known exception being rhythmic finger tapping. We therefore explored four simple tasks performed on a small touchscreen with relatively isolated movements of the index finger. Each task revealed a different right/left performance asymmetry. In a step-tracking Target Task, left-handed subjects showed greater accuracy with the index finger of the dominant left hand than with the nondominant right hand. In a Center-Out Task, right-handed subjects produced trajectories with the nondominant left hand that had greater curvature than those produced with the dominant right hand. In a continuous Circle Tracking Task, slips of the nondominant left index finger showed higher jerk than slips of the dominant right index finger. And in a continuous Complex Tracking Task, the nondominant left index finger showed shorter time lags in tracking the relatively unpredictable target than the dominant right index finger. Our findings are broadly consistent with previous studies indicating left hemisphere specialization for dynamic control and predictable situations vs. right hemisphere specialization for impedance control and unpredictable situations, the specialized contributions of the two hemispheres being combined to different degrees in the right vs. left hands of right-handed vs. left-handed individuals.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Keywords:  finger; handedness; motor control; movement

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26683065      PMCID: PMC4888971          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00256.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  33 in total

1.  Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; D Kalakanis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics.

Authors:  Leia B Bagesteiro; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Abduction, adduction and hand differences in simple and serial movements.

Authors:  J L Bradshaw; J A Bradshaw; N C Nettleton
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Hand preference and the laterality of cerebral speech.

Authors:  M Annett
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Manual asymmetries in the temporal and spatial control of aimed movements.

Authors:  Robert R A van Doorn
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.161

7.  Origins of the left & right brain.

Authors:  Peter F MacNeilage; Lesley J Rogers; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.142

Review 8.  Functional imaging of the motor system.

Authors:  J Ashe; K Ugurbil
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 9.  Convergent models of handedness and brain lateralization.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-08

10.  Limb dominance results from asymmetries in predictive and impedance control mechanisms.

Authors:  Vivek Yadav; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Long-interval intracortical inhibition is asymmetric in young but not older adults.

Authors:  A-M Vallence; E Smalley; P D Drummond; G R Hammond
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Influence of visual feedback, hand dominance and sex on individuated finger movements.

Authors:  Anna-Maria Johansson; Helena Grip; Louise Rönnqvist; Jonas Selling; Carl-Johan Boraxbekk; Andrew Strong; Charlotte K Häger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The neural foundations of handedness: insights from a rare case of deafferentation.

Authors:  S A L Jayasinghe; F R Sarlegna; R A Scheidt; R L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.974

4.  Finger Tapping Outperforms the Traditional Scale in Patients With Peripheral Nerve Damage.

Authors:  Lingli Zhang; Le Lei; Yilong Zhao; Rong Wang; Yulian Zhu; Zhusheng Yu; Xiaojing Zhang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Can Long-Term Regular Practice of Physical Exercises Including Taichi Improve Finger Tapping of Patients Presenting With Mild Cognitive Impairment?

Authors:  Lingli Zhang; Yilong Zhao; Chao Shen; Le Lei; Junjie Dong; Dongchen Zou; Jun Zou; Miao Wang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Handedness Matters for Motor Control But Not for Prediction.

Authors:  James Mathew; Fabrice R Sarlegna; Pierre-Michel Bernier; Frederic R Danion
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-06-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.