Literature DB >> 12704782

Quantitative evaluation of susceptibility and shielding effects of nitinol, platinum, cobalt-alloy, and stainless steel stents.

Yi Wang1, Thuy N Truong, Cecil Yen, Deniz Bilecen, Richard Watts, David W Trost, Martin R Prince.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to quantitatively estimate the shielding and susceptibility effects of commonly used metallic stents on MR signal. Two experiments were performed using a 3D gradient echo sequence with short TE to image a stent phantom: 1) short TR and high flip angle (contrast enhanced MRA parameters), and 2) long TR (TR >> T(1)) and low flip angle. The factor characterizing susceptibility effects was estimated from the signal phase of the first experiment, and then the factor characterizing the shielding effects was derived from the second experiment. Susceptibility induced signal loss was negligible (<1%) for nonstainless-steel (nitinol, platinum, and cobalt-alloy) stents and totally destructive (100%) for the stainless steel stent. Signal loss due to RF shielding was 31-62% for nitinol stents, 14-50% for platinum stents, 50-77% for the cobalt-alloy stents (undetermined for the stainless steel stent), varied with stent orientation, diameter, and wall geometry. In summary, stents made of nitinol, platinum, and cobalt-alloy have negligible susceptibility effects but stents made of stainless steel may have complete dephasing. All stents have substantial shielding effects, which vary with composition, geometry, and orientation. Large platinum stents may have the smallest artifacts and are the best suited for postinterventional MR imaging. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12704782     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  24 in total

1.  Comparing different MR angiography strategies of carotid stents in a vascular flow model: toward stent-specific recommendations in MR follow-up.

Authors:  Andreas M J Frölich; Sara M Pilgram-Pastor; Marios N Psychogios; Alexander Mohr; Michael Knauth
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of patients with airway stents.

Authors:  Yang Xia; Rui Jin; Wen Li; Huahao Shen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Real-time magnetic resonance imaging to guide pediatric endovascular procedures.

Authors:  A N Raval; R J Lederman
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Low-dose intra-arterial contrast-enhanced MR aortography in patients based on a theoretically derived injection protocol.

Authors:  S Potthast; A-C Schulte; G M Bongartz; R Hügli; M Aschwanden; D Bilecen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Carotid artery stents: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes using CT angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5T and 3T.

Authors:  M Lettau; A Sauer; S Heiland; S Rohde; M Bendszus; S Hähnel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Noninvasive imaging of treated cerebral aneurysms, part I: MR angiographic follow-up of coiled aneurysms.

Authors:  R C Wallace; J P Karis; S Partovi; D Fiorella
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Optimized protocols for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with thoracic metallic implants.

Authors:  Laura J Olivieri; Russell R Cross; Kendall E O'Brien; Kanishka Ratnayaka; Michael S Hansen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-06-04

8.  Real-time magnetic resonance imaging-guided stenting of aortic coarctation with commercially available catheter devices in Swine.

Authors:  Amish N Raval; James D Telep; Michael A Guttman; Cengizhan Ozturk; Michael Jones; Richard B Thompson; Victor J Wright; William H Schenke; Ranil DeSilva; Ronnier J Aviles; Venkatesh K Raman; Michael C Slack; Robert J Lederman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-07-25       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Contrast-enhanced time-resolved MRA for follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device.

Authors:  S R Boddu; F C Tong; S Dehkharghani; J E Dion; A M Saindane
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  In vitro comparison of different carotid artery stents: a pixel-by-pixel analysis using CT angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5 and 3 T.

Authors:  Michael Lettau; Annett Sauer; Sabine Heiland; Stefan Rohde; Julia Reinhardt; Martin Bendszus; Stefan Hähnel
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.