Literature DB >> 18259848

Psychological factors associated with emotional responses to receiving genetic risk information.

Paul Bennett1, Clare Wilkinson, Jim Turner, Kate Brain, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Gethin Griffith, Barbara France, Jonathon Gray.   

Abstract

This study identified levels of distress, and predictors of levels of distress, in women undergoing assessment for genetic risk of breast/ovarian cancer based on their family history. It comprised a cohort study following 154 women who completed questionnaires at entry into a cancer genetic assessment programme and following risk provision. Independent significant associates of anxiety following risk provision were age, neuroticism, feeling hopeless about developing cancer, a perceived lack of control over developing cancer, lack of a social confidant, and a coping response involving acceptance/resignation. Depression was associated with age, neuroticism, feeling hopeless about developing cancer, lack of social confidant, and a coping response involving acceptance/resignation. To avoid high levels of psychological morbidity in future cohorts undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment, information should be given that emphasises that some degree of control over health outcomes through behaviour change or increased surveillance is possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18259848     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-007-9136-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  33 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial of a brief self-help coping intervention designed to reduce distress when awaiting genetic risk information.

Authors:  Paul Bennett; Ceri Phelps; Kate Brain; Kerenza Hood; Jonathon Gray
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Effects of coping style and BRCA1 and BRCA2 test results on anxiety among women participating in genetic counseling and testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk.

Authors:  K P Tercyak; C Lerman; B N Peshkin; C Hughes; D Main; C Isaacs; M D Schwartz
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Degree of life-threat and differential use of coping modes.

Authors:  H Feifel; S Strack; V T Nagy
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Psychological distress in women at risk of hereditary breast/ovarian or HNPCC cancers in the absence of demonstrated mutations.

Authors:  Amy Østertun Geirdal; Jon G Reichelt; Alv A Dahl; Ketil Heimdal; Lovise Maehle; Astrid Stormorken; Pål Møller
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Effects of spouses on distress experienced by BRCA1 mutation carriers over time.

Authors:  Jean E Wylie; Ken R Smith; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.908

6.  BRCA1 testing with definitive results: a prospective study of psychological distress in a large clinic-based sample.

Authors:  Jon G Reichelt; Ketil Heimdal; Pål Møller; Alv A Dahl
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Age-specific norms and determinants of anxiety and depression in 731 women with breast cancer recruited through a population-based cancer registry.

Authors:  R H Osborne; G R Elsworth; J L Hopper
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress.

Authors:  A Cull; E D Anderson; S Campbell; J Mackay; E Smyth; M Steel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  A randomized trial of specialist genetic assessment: psychological impact on women at different levels of familial breast cancer risk.

Authors:  K Brain; P Norman; J Gray; C Rogers; R Mansel; P Harper
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-01-21       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  A randomised controlled trial of breast cancer genetics services in South East Scotland: psychological impact.

Authors:  A Fry; A Cull; S Appleton; R Rush; S Holloway; D Gorman; R Cetnarskyj; R Thomas; J Campbell; E Anderson; M Steel; M Porteous; H Campbell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  16 in total

1.  Genetic counseling as a tool for type 2 diabetes prevention: a genetic counseling framework for common polygenetic disorders.

Authors:  Jessica L Waxler; Kelsey E O'Brien; Linda M Delahanty; James B Meigs; Jose C Florez; Elyse R Park; Barbara R Pober; Richard W Grant
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Factors associated with intrusive cancer-related worries in women undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment.

Authors:  Paul Bennett; Clare Wilkinson; Jim Turner; Rhiannon Tudor Edwards; Barbara France; Gethin Griffith; Gethin Griffin; Jonathon Gray
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Hopes and Expectations Regarding Genetic Testing for Schizophrenia Among Young Adults at Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis.

Authors:  Phoebe Friesen; Ryan E Lawrence; Gary Brucato; Ragy R Girgis; Lisa Dixon
Journal:  J Psychiatr Pract       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.325

4.  microRNA and mRNA profiles in the amygdala are associated with stress-induced depression and resilience in juvenile mice.

Authors:  Mengmeng Shen; Zhenhua Song; Jin-Hui Wang
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  How does genetic testing influence anxiety, depression, and quality of life? A hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome suspects trial.

Authors:  Francisca Fernanda Barbosa Oliveira; Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva; Rosane Oliveira de Sant'Ana; Clarissa Gondim Picanço de Albuquerque; Maria Júlia Barbosa Bezerra; Deysi Viviana Tenazoa Wong; Flávio da Silveira Bitencourt; Isabelle Joyce de Lima Silva-Fernandes; Marcos Venicio Alves Lima
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  microRNA-15b contributes to depression-like behavior in mice by affecting synaptic protein levels and function in the nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Li Guo; Zhaoming Zhu; Guangyan Wang; Shan Cui; Meng Shen; Zhenhua Song; Jin-Hui Wang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Do Attachment Style and Emotion Regulation Strategies Indicate Distress in Predictive Testing?

Authors:  Lucienne B van der Meer; Erik van Duijn; Erik J Giltay; Aad Tibben
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Short-term psychological impact of the BRCA1/2 test result in women with breast cancer according to their perceived probability of genetic predisposition to cancer.

Authors:  A Brédart; J L Kop; A Depauw; O Caron; S Sultan; D Leblond; A Fajac; B Buecher; M Gauthier-Villars; C Noguès; C Flahault; D Stoppa-Lyonnet; S Dolbeault
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Incoordination among Subcellular Compartments Is Associated with Depression-Like Behavior Induced by Chronic Mild Stress.

Authors:  Aiping Xu; Shan Cui; Jin-Hui Wang
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 5.176

10.  Molecular Mechanism for Stress-Induced Depression Assessed by Sequencing miRNA and mRNA in Medial Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Ke Ma; Li Guo; Aiping Xu; Shan Cui; Jin-Hui Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.