Literature DB >> 12692701

Inhibition of return and the human frontal eye fields.

Tony Ro1, Alessandro Farnè, Erik Chang.   

Abstract

Inhibition of return (IOR) is a bias against reorienting attention to a previously cued location. In this study, using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we show that the human frontal eye fields (FEF) play a crucial role in the generation of IOR. When TMS was applied over the right FEF at a time interval after a visual cue but shortly before the target, IOR was modulated in the hemifield ipsilateral to the TMS such that responses to a previously cued target were no longer slower than responses to uncued targets. Control TMS over the superior parietal lobule, as well as TMS of the FEF shortly after the cue but well before the target, had no influence on IOR. We further show that the FEF is involved with visual selection as responses to targets appearing contralateral to the TMS of the FEF, but not the control site, were delayed. These results suggest that the FEF produces IOR by biasing attention and eye movements away from a previously attended location and facilitating target detection at novel locations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12692701     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1470-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  41 in total

1.  Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor processes.

Authors:  A Kingstone; J Pratt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-08

2.  Covert visual spatial orienting and saccades: overlapping neural systems.

Authors:  A C Nobre; D R Gitelman; E C Dias; M M Mesulam
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Inhibition of return in discrimination tasks.

Authors:  J Pratt; R A Abrams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later.

Authors:  J Lupiáñez; E G Milán; F J Tornay; E Madrid; P Tudela
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-11

Review 5.  Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements.

Authors:  R A Andersen; L H Snyder; D C Bradley; J Xing
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation during positron emission tomography: a new method for studying connectivity of the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  T Paus; R Jech; C J Thompson; R Comeau; T Peters; A C Evans
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Primate frontal eye fields. I. Single neurons discharging before saccades.

Authors:  C J Bruce; M E Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention.

Authors:  S P Tipper; B Weaver; L M Jerreat; A L Burak
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Dorsal cortical regions subserving visually guided saccades in humans: an fMRI study.

Authors:  B Luna; K R Thulborn; M H Strojwas; B J McCurtain; R A Berman; C R Genovese; J A Sweeney
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Endogenously generated and visually guided saccades after lesions of the human frontal eye fields.

Authors:  A Henik; R Rafal; D Rhodes
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  17 in total

1.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over frontal eye fields disrupts visually cued auditory attention.

Authors:  Daniel T Smith; Stephen R Jackson; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 2.  Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences.

Authors:  Alexandra Frischen; Andrew P Bayliss; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Covert orienting of attention and overt eye movements activate identical brain regions.

Authors:  Bianca de Haan; Paul S Morgan; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Evidence for an attentional component in saccadic inhibition of return.

Authors:  David Souto; Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Neuronal modulation of auditory attention by informative and uninformative spatial cues.

Authors:  Andrew R Mayer; Alexandre R Franco; Deborah L Harrington
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  An intact eye-movement system is not required to generate inhibition of return.

Authors:  Daniel T Smith; Stephen R Jackson; Chris Rorden
Journal:  J Neuropsychol       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 2.864

7.  Influence of environmental statistics on inhibition of saccadic return.

Authors:  Simon Farrell; Casimir J H Ludwig; Lucy A Ellis; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  fMRI correlates of inhibition of return in perifoveal and peripheral visual field.

Authors:  Quan Lei; Yan Bao; Bo Wang; Evgeny Gutyrchik
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08

9.  Dopaminergic Control of Attentional Flexibility: Inhibition of Return is Associated with the Dopamine Transporter Gene (DAT1).

Authors:  Lorenza S Colzato; Jay Pratt; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Relating dopaminergic and cholinergic polymorphisms to spatial attention in infancy.

Authors:  Julie Markant; Dante Cicchetti; Susan Hetzel; Kathleen M Thomas
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2013-06-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.