Literature DB >> 19338722

An intact eye-movement system is not required to generate inhibition of return.

Daniel T Smith1, Stephen R Jackson, Chris Rorden.   

Abstract

AI is unable to make eye-movements and has a deficit of reflexive attention. Here, we demonstrate that despite these deficits AI exhibits inhibition of return (IOR) for peripherally cued objects and locations. These data suggest that an intact oculomotor system is not required for the generation of either object-based or location-based IOR and are consistent with the view that the early, facilitatory effects of peripheral cues and late IOR effects are mediated by different mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19338722      PMCID: PMC3314024          DOI: 10.1348/174866408X324377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1748-6645            Impact factor:   2.864


  11 in total

1.  Inhibition of return in spatial attention: direct evidence for collicular generation.

Authors:  A Sapir; N Soroker; A Berger; A Henik
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Inhibition of return and the human frontal eye fields.

Authors:  Tony Ro; Alessandro Farnè; Erik Chang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Exogenous orienting of attention depends upon the ability to execute eye movements.

Authors:  Daniel T Smith; Chris Rorden; Stephen R Jackson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention.

Authors:  S P Tipper; J Driver; B Weaver
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-05

5.  The effects of practice on object-based, location-based, and static-display inhibition of return.

Authors:  B Weaver; J Lupiáñez; F L Watson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-08

6.  Using the eye-movement system to control the head.

Authors:  I D Gilchrist; V Brown; J M Findlay; M P Clarke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention.

Authors:  S P Tipper; B Weaver; L M Jerreat; A L Burak
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Saccades without eye movements.

Authors:  I D Gilchrist; V Brown; J M Findlay
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-11-13       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Disruption of reflexive attention and eye movements in an individual with a collicular lesion.

Authors:  Anne B Sereno; Kevin A Briand; Silvia C Amador; Susan V Szapiel
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.475

10.  Inhibitory Tagging of Locations in the Blind Field of Hemianopic Patients

Authors: 
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  1997-06
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Associations and Dissociations between Oculomotor Readiness and Covert Attention.

Authors:  Soazig Casteau; Daniel T Smith
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-07

2.  Electrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Tang; Xueli Wang; Xing Peng; Qi Li; Chi Zhang; Aijun Wang; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.