Literature DB >> 20502626

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over frontal eye fields disrupts visually cued auditory attention.

Daniel T Smith1, Stephen R Jackson, Chris Rorden.   

Abstract

Voluntary eye movements and covert shifts of visual attention activate the same brain regions. Specifically, the intraparietal sulcus and the frontal eye fields (FEF) appear to be involved both with generating voluntary saccades as well with attending to a peripheral spatial location. Furthermore, these regions appear to be required by both tasks--functional disruption of these regions impairs both tasks. Therefore, it appears that the targeting system that allows us to plan saccades is the same system that allows us to covertly track peripheral visual information. Recent neuroimaging studies suggest that these brain regions are also activated when participants engage in auditory spatial attention tasks. However, it remains unclear whether these regions are required by these tasks. We used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to disrupt the FEF while participants performed an auditory localization task. On each trial, a visual cue directed attention to the probable laterality of the auditory target, and the participant decided whether the subsequent target sound came from an upper or lower speaker. In the absence of TMS, individuals were faster to respond to targets that occurred on the cued side (valid trials) than when the target appears contralaterally to the cued side (invalid side). TMS interfered with this effect, such that the costs associated with ipsilateral invalidly cued targets were substantially reduced. These results suggest that the eye-movement system is needed for normal auditory attention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frontal eye fields (FEF); audition; endogenous attention; humans; reaction times

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20502626      PMCID: PMC2874914          DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  35 in total

1.  On the role of eye movements and saccade preparation in generating auditory inhibition of return.

Authors:  T A Mondor; N A Terrio; J Hurlburt
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2000-12

Review 2.  Visuomotor origins of covert spatial attention.

Authors:  Tirin Moore; Katherine M Armstrong; Mazyar Fallah
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 3.  New light through old windows: moving beyond the "virtual lesion" approach to transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Juha Silvanto; Neil G Muggleton
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of visual attention during saccade preparation: Independence and coupling between attention and movement planning.

Authors:  Anna Montagnini; Eric Castet
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996.

Authors:  E M Wassermann
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-01

Review 6.  Oculomotor functions of the parietal lobe: Effects of chronic lesions in humans.

Authors:  Robert D Rafal
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left human frontal eye fields eliminates the cost of invalid endogenous cues.

Authors:  Daniel T Smith; Stephen R Jackson; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Endogenously generated and visually guided saccades after lesions of the human frontal eye fields.

Authors:  A Henik; R Rafal; D Rhodes
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Left frontal eye field remembers "where" but not "what".

Authors:  Gianluca Campana; Alan Cowey; Clara Casco; Inge Oudsen; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  FEF TMS affects visual cortical activity.

Authors:  Paul C J Taylor; Anna C Nobre; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  5 in total

1.  Orbito-frontal cortex mechanism of inhibition of return in current and remitted depression.

Authors:  Qin Dai; Xuntao Yin; Hong Li; Zhengzhi Feng
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Spatial attention evokes similar activation patterns for visual and auditory stimuli.

Authors:  David V Smith; Ben Davis; Kathy Niu; Eric W Healy; Leonardo Bonilha; Julius Fridriksson; Paul S Morgan; Chris Rorden
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Right Prefrontal TMS Disrupts Interregional Anticipatory EEG Alpha Activity during Shifting of Visuospatial Attention.

Authors:  Paul Sauseng; Jan F Feldheim; Roman Freunberger; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-10-05

4.  Alpha rhythms in audition: cognitive and clinical perspectives.

Authors:  Nathan Weisz; Thomas Hartmann; Nadia Müller; Isabel Lorenz; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-04-26

5.  Transient human auditory cortex activation during volitional attention shifting.

Authors:  Christian Harm Uhlig; Alexander Gutschalk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.