Literature DB >> 10497426

Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor processes.

A Kingstone1, J Pratt.   

Abstract

Response time can be delayed if a target stimulus appears at a location or object that was previously cued. This inhibition of return (IOR) phenomenon has been attributed to a delay in activating attentional or motor processes to a previously cued stimulus. Two experiments required subjects to localize or identify a target stimulus. In Experiment 1, the subjects' eyes were not monitored. In Experiment 2, the subjects' eyes were monitored, and the subjects were instructed to either execute or withhold an eye movement to a target stimulus. The results indicated that IOR was always present for location and identification responses, supporting an attentional account of IOR. However, IOR was larger when eye movements were executed, indicating that a motor component can contribute to IOR. Finally, when eye movements were withheld, IOR was larger when a target was presented alone than when it was presented with a distractor, suggesting that IOR is larger for exogenous than for endogenous covert orienting. Together, the data indicate that IOR is composed of both an oculomotor component and an attentional component.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10497426     DOI: 10.3758/bf03207612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  24 in total

1.  Inhibition of return in static and dynamic displays.

Authors:  Shawn E Christ; Christina S McCrae; Richard A Abrams
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-03

2.  Tracking the influence of reflexive attention on sensory and cognitive processing.

Authors:  J B Hopfinger; G R Mangun
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Do action goals mediate social inhibition of return?

Authors:  Geoff G Cole; Paul A Skarratt; Rebeccah-Claire Billing
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-12-06

4.  Inhibition of return and the human frontal eye fields.

Authors:  Tony Ro; Alessandro Farnè; Erik Chang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Inhibition of return: a graphical meta-analysis of its time course and an empirical test of its temporal and spatial properties.

Authors:  Arthur G Samuel; Donna Kat
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

6.  Looking for inhibition of return in pigeons.

Authors:  Brett M Gibson; Igor Juricevic; Sara J Shettleworth; Jay Pratt; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Two spatially separated attention systems in the visual field: evidence from inhibition of return.

Authors:  Yan Bao; Ernst Pöppel
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-03

8.  The number line effect reflects top-down control.

Authors:  Jelena Ristic; Alissa Wright; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

9.  Disentangling perceptual and motor components in inhibition of return.

Authors:  Bin Zhou
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2008-03-08

10.  The role of spatial attention and other processes on the magnitude and time course of cueing effects.

Authors:  María Jesús Funes; Juan Lupiáñez; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2005-01-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.