Literature DB >> 6174299

Pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials and retinal eccentricity.

J T Meredith, G G Celesia.   

Abstract

The effect of stimulation of discrete areas of the retina on visual evoked potentials (VEP) was studied in 16 normal volunteers. The stimulus consisted of a constant luminance 2 degrees 18' field containing checks of 34'30' reversing at a frequency of 500 msec. The amplitude of the VEP was highest at the fixation point and inside the 2 degrees isopter. Rapid amplitude decrement was noted with stimuli located within the 2-4 degrees isopters. No identifiable response was obtained outside the 4 degrees or 6 degrees isopter with a 2 degrees 18' stimulus. VEP could, however, be elicited by increasing the size of the stimulus. The smallest size of a field required to evoke a detectable response also varied in relations to retinal eccentricity. Stimulation at 0 degree, 8 degrees and 14 degrees horizontal eccentricities with fields of a size estimated to activate an equivalent amount visual cortex produced VEPs of similar amplitude.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6174299     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(82)90082-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  13 in total

1.  Effect of stimulus check size on multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Chandra Balachandran; Alexander I Klistorner; Stuart L Graham
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  The topographic distribution of the magnetic P100M to full- and half-field stimulation.

Authors:  G Harding; B Janday; R Armstrong
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  The human motion VEP as a function of size and eccentricity of the stimulation field.

Authors:  R Müller; E Göpfert; L Schlykowa; D Anke
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Correlation between full-field and multifocal VEPs in optic neuritis.

Authors:  Alexander Klistorner; Clare Fraser; Raymond Garrick; Stuart Graham; Hemamalini Arvind
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Topographic mapping and source localization of the pattern reversal visual evoked magnetic response.

Authors:  G F Harding; B Janday; R A Armstrong
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Visual evoked potentials in macular hole.

Authors:  M Kato; T Nakagami; I Watanabe
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Electrophysiological evidence for interhemispheric transmission of visual information in man.

Authors:  N Berardi; I Bodis-Wollner; A Fiorentini; G Giuffré; M Morelli
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Effect of different stimulus configurations on the visual evoked potential (VEP).

Authors:  Naveen K Yadav; Diana P Ludlam; Kenneth J Ciuffreda
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  N-3-pyridylmethyl-N'-p-nitrophenylurea ocular toxicity in man and an animal model.

Authors:  J S Mindel
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1986

10.  Foveal interocular time thresholds and latency differences in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W H Ehrenstein; K Manny; G Oepen
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.