Literature DB >> 3372166

Effect of number of elements and size of stimulus field on recordability of pattern reversal visual evoked response.

O Katsumi1, T Hirose, T Tsukada.   

Abstract

The interrelationships among amplitude of the pattern reversal visual evoked response (VER), check size (spatial frequency) of the stimulus pattern elements, size of the stimulus field, and number of elements in the stimulus field were investigated. When the stimulus field was smaller than 4.0 degrees X 4.0 degrees, the VER amplitude-check size curve had a high-pass filter shape. When the stimulus field was larger than 5.0 degrees X 5.0 degrees, the curve showed the inverted-U shape. At the largest stimulus field, 12.0 degrees X 12.0 degrees, the curve retained the inverted-U shape, but its peak moved to a larger check size. With smaller check sizes (10 and 20 min), the VER amplitude increased up to a certain stimulus field size and then showed either saturation or a decrease. When the number of elements in the stimulus field was less than 40, the VER amplitude did not increase significantly in all check sizes. Above this number of elements in the field, the amplitude increased linearly until saturation was observed at an element number of 300-400. We concluded that the amplitude of the pattern reversal VER depended strongly on the interrelationship among check size, stimulus field size, and number of elements in the field.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3372166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  10 in total

1.  Effect of stimulus check size on multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Chandra Balachandran; Alexander I Klistorner; Stuart L Graham
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Objective measurement of contrast sensitivity using the steady-state visual evoked potential.

Authors:  S A Chen; L Z Wu; D Z Wu
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Steady-state visual evoked cortical potentials from stimulation of visual field quadrants. Optimizing pattern variables for the size of the field to be investigated.

Authors:  M Bradnam; D Keating; D Montgomery; A Evans; B Damato; A Cluckie
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Colored focal visual evoked potentials by cathode ray tube versus scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  F Rigaudière; J F Le Gargasson; J E Guez; Y Grall
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Pattern electroretinogram and visual evoked potential amplitudes are influenced by different stimulus field sizes and scotomata.

Authors:  A Junghardt; H Wildberger; Y Robert; B Török
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Effects of sweep VEP parameters on visual acuity and contrast thresholds in children and adults.

Authors:  Fahad M Almoqbel; Naveen K Yadav; Susan J Leat; Liseann M Head; Elizabeth L Irving
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Fullfield and extrafoveal visual evoked potentials in healthy eyes: reference data for a curved OLED display.

Authors:  Sabine Baumgarten; Tabea Hoberg; Tibor Lohmann; Babac Mazinani; Peter Walter; Antonis Koutsonas
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Electrophysiological findings in paraneoplastic retinopathy.

Authors:  Y Matsui; M C Mehta; O Katsumi; S E Brodie; T Hirose
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  The neural signature of numerosity by separating numerical and continuous magnitude extraction in visual cortex with frequency-tagged EEG.

Authors:  Amandine Van Rinsveld; Mathieu Guillaume; Peter J Kohler; Christine Schiltz; Wim Gevers; Alain Content
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Assessment of Human Visual Acuity Using Visual Evoked Potential: A Review.

Authors:  Xiaowei Zheng; Guanghua Xu; Kai Zhang; Renghao Liang; Wenqiang Yan; Peiyuan Tian; Yaguang Jia; Sicong Zhang; Chenghang Du
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.