Literature DB >> 11481284

Electroencephalogram-based scaling of multifocal visual evoked potentials: effect on intersubject amplitude variability.

A I Klistorner1, S L Graham.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The interindividual variability of the visual evoked potential (VEP) has been recognized as a problem for interpretation of clinical results. This study examines whether VEP variability can be reduced by scaling responses according to underlying electroencephalogram (EEG) activity.
METHODS: A multifocal objective perimeter provided different random check patterns to each of 58 points extending out to 32 degrees nasally. A multichannel VEP was recorded (bipolar occipital cross electrodes, 7 min/eye). One hundred normal subjects (age 58.9 +/- 10.7 years) were tested. The amplitude and inter-eye asymmetry coefficient for each point of the field was calculated. VEP signals were then normalized according to underlying EEG activity recorded using Fourier transform to quantify EEG levels. High alpha-rhythm and electrocardiogram contamination were removed before scaling.
RESULTS: High intersubject variability was present in the multifocal VEP, with amplitude in women on average 33% larger than in men. The variability for all left eyes was 42.2% +/- 3.9%, for right eyes 41.7% +/- 4.4% (coefficient of variability [CV]). There was a strong correlation between EEG activity and the amplitude of the VEP (left eye, r = 0.83; P < 0.001; right eye, r = 0.82; P < 0.001). When this was used to normalize VEP results, the CVs dropped to 24.6% +/- 3.1% (P < 0.0001) and 24.0% +/- 3.2% (P < 0.0001), respectively. The gender difference was effectively removed.
CONCLUSIONS: Using underlying EEG amplitudes to normalize an individual's VEP substantially reduces intersubject variability, including differences between men and women. This renders the use of a normal database more reliable when applying the multifocal VEP in the clinical detection of visual field changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11481284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  29 in total

1.  Effect of stimulus check size on multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Chandra Balachandran; Alexander I Klistorner; Stuart L Graham
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Multifocal VEP in children: its maturation and clinical application.

Authors:  C Balachandran; A I Klistorner; F Billson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Diagnostic value of multifocal VEP using cross-validation and noise reduction in glaucoma research.

Authors:  Thomas Lindenberg; Andrea Peters; Folkert K Horn; Berthold Lausen; Matthias Korth
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Reproducibility of multifocal VEP latency using different stimulus presentations.

Authors:  Prema Sriram; Alexander Klistorner; Hemamalini Arvind; Stuart L Graham
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Optimal conditions for multifocal VEP recording for normal Japanese population established by receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Authors:  Kumiko Ishikawa; Takayuki Nagai; Yuko Yamada; Akira Negi; Makoto Nakamura
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  The influence of defocus on multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Christina Pieh; Michael B Hoffmann; Michael Bach
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Determining abnormal interocular latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Xian Zhang; Christopher Rodarte; E Bo Yang; Nitin Ohri; Brad Fortune; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Multifocal visual evoked responses to dichoptic stimulation using virtual reality goggles: Multifocal VER to dichoptic stimulation.

Authors:  Hemamalini Arvind; Alexander Klistorner; Stuart L Graham; John R Grigg
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Intertest variability of mfVEP amplitude: reducing its effect on the interpretation of sequential tests.

Authors:  A Klistorner; S L Graham
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Correlation between full-field and multifocal VEPs in optic neuritis.

Authors:  Alexander Klistorner; Clare Fraser; Raymond Garrick; Stuart Graham; Hemamalini Arvind
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.