Literature DB >> 3223510

An objective VER assessment of visual acuity compared with subjective measures.

T C Jenkins1, W A Douthwaite.   

Abstract

Visual acuity was estimated by making amplitude measurements of the transient visually evoked response (VER) wave to pattern reversal using check sizes of 5.5, 7.5, 8.5, and 9.5 min arc. As in previous studies the 5.5 min arc check produced a response which reflected the visual acuity of the high acuity subjects, but often failed to produce a VER wave at the low acuity end. The proposal is made that where the 5.5 min arc check produces an acceptable wave (amplitude greater than 1.5 microV) then the regression line for the 5.5 check can be used to predict visual acuity. Where the VER amplitude is below 1.5 microV for this small check size then a second recording must be made using the 9.5 min arc check and the visual acuity predicted from the 9.5 check regression line.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3223510     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-198812000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0093-7002


  9 in total

1.  Effect of stimulus check size on multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Chandra Balachandran; Alexander I Klistorner; Stuart L Graham
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Pattern visual evoked potentials in the assessment of objective visual acuity in amblyopic children.

Authors:  Fatih C Gundogan; Fatih M Mutlu; H Ibrahim Altinsoy; Ahmet Tas; Oguzhan Oz; Gungor Sobaci
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Assessment of patients with suspected non-organic visual loss using pattern appearance visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Vikki A McBain; Anthony G Robson; Chris R Hogg; Graham E Holder
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Pattern reversal visual evoked response and Snellen visual acuity.

Authors:  O Katsumi; M C Mehta; E W Larson-Park; C J Skladzien; T Hirose
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Comparison of preferential looking acuity and pattern reversal visual evoked response acuity in pediatric patients.

Authors:  O Katsumi; S Denno; M Arai; J De Lopes Faria; T Hirose
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Pattern visual evoked potential as a predictor of occlusion therapy for amblyopia.

Authors:  Woosuk Chung; Samin Hong; Jong Bok Lee; Sueng-Han Han
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-12

7.  Comparison of Snellen acuity and objective assessment using the spatial frequency sweep PVER.

Authors:  M Arai; O Katsumi; F R Paranhos; J M Lopes De Faria; T Hirose
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Predicting potential acuities in amblyopes: predicting post-therapy acuity in amblyopes.

Authors:  William H Ridder; Michael W Rouse
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 1.854

9.  Effect of refractive error on visual evoked potentials with pattern stimulation in dogs.

Authors:  Yosuke Ito; Seiya Maehara; Yoshiki Itoh; Ai Matsui; Miri Hayashi; Akira Kubo; Tsuyoshi Uchide
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 1.267

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.