Literature DB >> 17051383

Distractor objects affect fingers' angular distances but not fingers' shaping during grasping.

Caterina Ansuini1, Veronica Tognin, Luca Turella, Umberto Castiello.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine whether and how hand shaping was affected by the presence of a distractor object adjacent to the to-be-grasped object. Twenty subjects were requested to reach towards and grasp a 'convex' or a 'concave' object in the presence or absence of a distractor object either of the same or different shape than the target object. Flexion/extension at the metacarpal-phalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal joints of all digits, and abduction angle between digits were measured by resistive sensors embedded in a glove. The results indicate robust interference effects at the level of reach duration and the extent of fingers' abduction angles together with changes at the level of a single joint for the thumb. No distractor effects on individual fingers' joints except for the MCP of the middle and little fingers were found. These findings suggest that the presence of distractor object affects hand shaping in terms of fingers' abduction angles, but not at the level of 'shape dependent' fingers' angular excursions. Furthermore, they support the importance of the thumb for the guidance of selective reach-to-grasp movements. We discuss these results in the context of current theories proposed to explain the object selection processes underlying the control of hand action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17051383     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0723-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  20 in total

1.  Mechanisms of selection for the control of hand action.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Patterns of hand motion during grasping and the influence of sensory guidance.

Authors:  Marco Santello; Martha Flanders; John F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Selective reaching: evidence for multiple frames of reference.

Authors:  Ron F Keulen; Jos J Adam; Martin H Fischer; Harm Kuipers; Jelle Jolles
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching.

Authors:  A M Wing; A Turton; C Fraser
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Hand movements deviate toward distracters in the absence of response competition.

Authors:  Steve W C Chang; Richard A Abrams
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  2004-10

6.  Dissociation of covert and overt spatial attention during prehension movements: selective interference effects.

Authors:  C Bonfiglioli; U Castiello
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-11

7.  Attentional coding for three-dimensional objects and two-dimensional shapes. Differential interference effects.

Authors:  U Castiello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Grasping a fruit: selection for action.

Authors:  U Castiello
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Control of grasp stability when humans lift objects with different surface curvatures.

Authors:  P Jenmalm; A W Goodwin; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension.

Authors:  M A Goodale; J P Meenan; H H Bülthoff; D A Nicolle; K J Murphy; C I Racicot
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The cognitive neuroscience of prehension: recent developments.

Authors:  Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Outsider interference: no role for motor lateralization in determining the strength of avoidance responses during reaching.

Authors:  Rudmer Menger; Stefan Van der Stigchel; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 1.972

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.