Literature DB >> 1769391

Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 2. The effects of changing object size.

Y Paulignan1, M Jeannerod, C MacKenzie, R Marteniuk.   

Abstract

1. Subjects were instructed to reach and grasp cylindrical objects, using a precision grip. The objects were two concentric dowels made of translucent material placed at 35 cm from the subject. The inner ("small") dowel was 10 cm high and 1.5 cm in diameter. The outer ("large") dowel was 6 cm high and 6 cm in diameter. Prehension movements were monitored using a Selspot system. The displacement of a marker placed at the wrist level was used as an index for the transport of the hand at the location of the object. Markers placed at the tips of the thumb and the index finger were used for measuring the size of aperture of the finger grip. 2. Kinematics of transport and grasp components were computed from the filtered displacement signals. Movement time (MT), time to peak velocity (TPV) and time to peak deceleration (TPD) of the wrist, time to peak velocity of grip aperture (TGV), time to maximum grip aperture (TGA) were the main parameters used for comparing the movements in different conditions. Spatial paths of the wrist, thumb and index markers were reconstructed in two dimensions. Variability of the spatial paths over repeated trials was computed as the surface of the ellipses defined by X and Y standard deviations from the mean path. 3. Computer controlled illumination of one of the dowels was the signal for reaching toward that dowel. Blocks of trials were made to the small dowel and to the large dowel. Mean MT during blocked trials was 550 ms. The acceleration phase of the movements (measured by parameter TPV) represented 33% of MT. About half of MT (52%) was spent after TPD in a low velocity phase while the hand was approaching the object. This kinematic pattern was not influenced by whether movements were directed at small or large dowels. 4. Grip aperture progressively increased during transport of the hand. TGA corresponded to about 60% of MT, that is, maximum grip aperture was reached during the low velocity phase of transport. Following TGA, fingers closed around the object until contact was made. This pattern of grip formation differed whether the movement was directed at the large or the small dowel: TGA occurred often earlier for the small dowel, and the size of the maximum grip aperture was larger for the large dowel. Variability of both the wrist and finger spatial paths was larger during the first half of MT, and tended to become very low as the hand approached the dowels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1769391     DOI: 10.1007/bf00231858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  26 in total

1.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching.

Authors:  A M Wing; A Turton; C Fraser
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Remote responses to perturbation in human prehension.

Authors:  P Haggard; A M Wing
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1991-01-14       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements.

Authors:  M Gentilucci; U Castiello; M L Corradini; M Scarpa; C Umiltà; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  The coupling of arm and finger movements during prehension.

Authors:  Y Paulignan; C MacKenzie; R Marteniuk; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Motor control of serial ordering of speech.

Authors:  P F MacNeilage
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 6.  Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation.

Authors:  D Bullock; S Grossberg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  The control of hand movements in a case of hemianaesthesia following a parietal lesion.

Authors:  M Jeannerod; F Michel; C Prablanc
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Control of complex motor gestures: orofacial muscle responses to load perturbations of lip during speech.

Authors:  J H Abbs; V L Gracco
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Preparation for grasping an object: a developmental study.

Authors:  C von Hofsten; L Rönnqvist
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects.

Authors:  M T Perenin; A Vighetto
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  75 in total

1.  Effects of accuracy constraints on reach-to-grasp movements in cerebellar patients.

Authors:  M K Rand; Y Shimansky; G E Stelmach; V Bracha; J R Bloedel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Patterns of hand motion during grasping and the influence of sensory guidance.

Authors:  Marco Santello; Martha Flanders; John F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The influence of obstacles on the speed of grasping.

Authors:  Marianne Biegstraaten; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  A step and a hop on the Müller-Lyer: illusion effects on lower-limb movements.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The use of visual feedback and on-line target information in catching and grasping.

Authors:  Thomas Schenk; Barbara Mair; Josef Zihl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Adaptation of reach-to-grasp movement in response to force perturbations.

Authors:  M K Rand; Y Shimansky; G E Stelmach; J R Bloedel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  A simple rule for controlling overarm throws to different targets.

Authors:  Sherry Watts; Ivan Pessotto; Jon Hore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Grasping an object naturally or with a tool: are these tasks guided by a common motor representation?

Authors:  Maurizio Gentilucci; Alice C Roy; Silvia Stefanini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Keeping the world at hand: rapid visuomotor processing for hand-object interactions.

Authors:  Tamar R Makin; Nicholas P Holmes; Claudio Brozzoli; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Bimanual coordination affects motor task switching.

Authors:  Brandon J Bernardin; Andrea H Mason
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.