Literature DB >> 11037295

A test between two hypotheses and a possible third way for the control of prehension.

M Mon-Williams1, R D McIntosh.   

Abstract

We used an obstacle avoidance task to test two opposing accounts of how the nervous system controls prehension. The visuomotor account supposes that the system independently controls the grip formation and transport phase of prehensile movements. In contrast, the digit channel hypothesis suggests that the system controls the thumb and finger more or less independently. Our data strongly favoured the traditional visuomotor channel hypothesis and demonstrated that the time taken to grasp an object in the presence of obstacles was well predicted by a Fitts' law relationship. We suggest a "thirdway" hypothesis in order to retain the advantages of the digit channel hypothesis within the visuomotor framework. The third-way hypothesis suggests that the nervous system selects a single digit to transport to the object. We speculate that the actual digit selected might depend upon attention and the nature of the prehension task. This hypothesis is able to account for most of the empirical findings unearthed by researchers investigating the control of prehension.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11037295     DOI: 10.1007/s002210000479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  23 in total

1.  The influence of obstacles on the speed of grasping.

Authors:  Marianne Biegstraaten; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The bottle and the glass say to me: "pour!".

Authors:  Elisa De Stefani; Alessandro Innocenti; Nicolò Francesco Bernardi; Giovanna Cristina Campione; Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Hand orientation during reach-to-grasp movements modulates neuronal activity in the medial posterior parietal area V6A.

Authors:  Patrizia Fattori; Rossella Breveglieri; Nicoletta Marzocchi; Daniela Filippini; Annalisa Bosco; Claudio Galletti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Why does an obstacle just below the digits' paths not influence a grasping movement while an obstacle to the side of their paths does?

Authors:  Rebekka Verheij; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Calibrating grasp size and reach distance: interactions reveal integral organization of reaching-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  Rachel Coats; Geoffrey P Bingham; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Intact automatic avoidance of obstacles in patients with visual form agnosia.

Authors:  Nichola J Rice; Robert D McIntosh; Igor Schindler; Mark Mon-Williams; Jean-François Démonet; A David Milner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Gaze-grasp coordination in obstacle avoidance: differences between binocular and monocular viewing.

Authors:  Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Grasping and hitting moving objects.

Authors:  Willemijn D Schot; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Role of the medial parieto-occipital cortex in the control of reaching and grasping movements.

Authors:  Claudio Galletti; Dieter F Kutz; Michela Gamberini; Rossella Breveglieri; Patrizia Fattori
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-27       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Avoiding moving obstacles.

Authors:  M Pilar Aivar; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.