Literature DB >> 22124890

Perceptual sensitivity to high-frequency interaural time differences created by rustling sounds.

Stephan D Ewert1, Katharina Kaiser, Lavinia Kernschmidt, Lutz Wiegrebe.   

Abstract

Interaural time differences (ITDs) can be used to localize sounds in the horizontal plane. ITDs can be extracted from either the fine structure of low-frequency sounds or from the envelopes of high-frequency sounds. Studies of the latter have included stimuli with periodic envelopes like amplitude-modulated tones or transposed stimuli, and high-pass filtered Gaussian noises. Here, four experiments are presented investigating the perceptual relevance of ITD cues in synthetic and recorded "rustling" sounds. Both share the broad long-term power spectrum with Gaussian noise but provide more pronounced envelope fluctuations than Gaussian noise, quantified by an increased waveform fourth moment, W. The current data show that the JNDs in ITD for band-pass rustling sounds tended to improve with increasing W and with increasing bandwidth when the sounds were band limited. In contrast, no influence of W on JND was observed for broadband sounds, apparently because of listeners' sensitivity to ITD in low-frequency fine structure, present in the broadband sounds. Second, it is shown that for high-frequency rustling sounds ITD JNDs can be as low as 30 μs. The third result was that the amount of dominance for ITD extraction of low frequencies decreases systematically with increasing amount of envelope fluctuations. Finally, it is shown that despite the exceptionally good envelope ITD sensitivity evident with high-frequency rustling sounds, minimum audible angles of both synthetic and recorded high-frequency rustling sounds in virtual acoustic space are still best when the angular information is mediated by interaural level differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22124890      PMCID: PMC3254714          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-011-0303-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  40 in total

1.  Interaural phase and level difference sensitivity in low-frequency neurons in the lateral superior olive.

Authors:  Daniel J Tollin; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Why do transposed stimuli enhance binaural processing?: Interaural envelope correlation vs envelope normalized fourth moment.

Authors:  Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Coding of temporally fluctuating interaural timing disparities in a binaural processing model based on phase differences.

Authors:  Mathias Dietz; Stephan D Ewert; Volker Hohmann; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Binaural jitter improves interaural time-difference sensitivity of cochlear implantees at high pulse rates.

Authors:  Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Lateralization of stimuli with independent fine-structure and envelope-based temporal disparities.

Authors:  Mathias Dietz; Stephan D Ewert; Volker Hohmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Interaural level difference discrimination thresholds for single neurons in the lateral superior olive.

Authors:  Daniel J Tollin; Kanthaiah Koka; Jeffrey J Tsai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Amplitude-modulation detection at low- and high-audio frequencies.

Authors:  D A Eddins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. I. Sensitivity to interaural time differences.

Authors:  P X Joris; T C Yin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Discrimination of interaural envelope delays: the effect of randomizing component starting phase.

Authors:  R H Dye; A J Niemiec; M A Stellmack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Neural population coding of sound level adapts to stimulus statistics.

Authors:  Isabel Dean; Nicol S Harper; David McAlpine
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-06       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  7 in total

1.  Discovering your inner bat: echo-acoustic target ranging in humans.

Authors:  Sven Schörnich; Andreas Nagy; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-23

Review 2.  The Calyx of Held: A Hypothesis on the Need for Reliable Timing in an Intensity-Difference Encoder.

Authors:  Philip X Joris; Laurence O Trussell
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Spectro-temporal weighting of interaural time differences in speech.

Authors:  Lucas S Baltzell; Adrian Y Cho; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Envelope contributions to the representation of interaural time difference in the forebrain of barn owls.

Authors:  Philipp Tellers; Jessica Lehmann; Hartmut Führ; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Effects of Hearing Loss on Interaural Time Difference Sensitivity at Low and High Frequencies.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Lucas S Baltzell; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

6.  Reducing the Device Delay Mismatch Can Improve Sound Localization in Bimodal Cochlear Implant/Hearing-Aid Users.

Authors:  Stefan Zirn; Julian Angermeier; Susan Arndt; Antje Aschendorff; Thomas Wesarg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 7.  The Perception of Auditory Motion.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; Johahn Leung
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.293

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.