Literature DB >> 8371084

What ears do for bats: a comparative study of pinna sound pressure transformation in chiroptera.

M K Obrist1, M B Fenton, J L Eger, P A Schlegel.   

Abstract

Using a moveable loudspeaker and an implanted microphone, we studied the sound pressure transformation of the external ears of 47 species of bats from 13 families. We compared pinna gain, directionality of hearing and interaural intensity differences (IID) in echolocating and non-echolocating bats, in species using different echolocation strategies and in species that depend upon prey-generated sounds to locate their targets. In the Pteropodidae, two echolocating species had slightly higher directionality than a non-echolocating species. The ears of phyllostomid and vespertilionid species showed moderate directionality. In the Mormoopidae, the ear directionality of Pteronotus parnellii clearly matched the dominant spectral component of its echolocation calls, unlike the situation in three other species. Species in the Emballonuridae, Molossidae, Rhinopomatidae and two vespertilionids that use narrow-band search-phase echolocation calls showed increasingly sharp tuning of the pinna to the main frequency of their signals. Similar tuning was most evident in Hipposideridae and Rhinolophidae, species specialized for flutter detection via Doppler-shifted echoes of high-duty-cycle narrow-band signals. The large pinnae of bats that use prey-generated sounds to find their targets supply high sound pressure gain at lower frequencies. Increasing domination of a narrow spectral band in echolocation is reflected in the passive acoustic properties of the external ears (sharper directionality). The importance of IIDs for lateralization and horizontal localization is discussed by comparing the behavioural directional performance of bats with their bioacoustical features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8371084     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.180.1.119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  35 in total

1.  The effect of temporal structure on rustling-sound detection in the gleaning bat, Megaderma lyra.

Authors:  M Hübner; L Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Sound pressure transformations by the head and pinnae of the adult Chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera).

Authors:  Kanthaiah Koka; Heath G Jones; Jennifer L Thornton; J Eric Lupo; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  What the bat's voice tells the bat's brain.

Authors:  Nachum Ulanovsky; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Hearing in the FM-bat Phyllostomus discolor: a behavioral audiogram.

Authors:  K H Esser; A Daucher
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Echolocating bats detect but misperceive a multidimensional incongruent acoustic stimulus.

Authors:  Sasha Danilovich; Gal Shalev; Arjan Boonman; Aya Goldshtein; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Development of the head, pinnae, and acoustical cues to sound location in a precocial species, the guinea pig (Cavia porcellus).

Authors:  Kelsey L Anbuhl; Victor Benichoux; Nathaniel T Greene; Andrew D Brown; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Spatial tuning of neurons in the inferior colliculus of the big brown bat: effects of sound level, stimulus type and multiple sound sources.

Authors:  B Grothe; E Covey; J H Casseday
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Sound localization cues in the marmoset monkey.

Authors:  Sean J Slee; Eric D Young
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  What noseleaves do for FM bats depends on their degree of sensorial specialization.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Fons De Mey; Herbert Peremans; Inga Geipel; Elisabeth Kalko; Uwe Firzlaff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Can two streams of auditory information be processed simultaneously? Evidence from the gleaning bat Antrozous pallidus.

Authors:  J R Barber; K A Razak; Z M Fuzessery
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.