Literature DB >> 33384901

Individual differences show that only some bats can cope with noise-induced masking and distraction.

Dylan G E Gomes1,2, Holger R Goerlitz1.   

Abstract

Anthropogenic noise is a widespread pollutant that has received considerable recent attention. While alarming effects on wildlife have been documented, we have limited understanding of the perceptual mechanisms of noise disturbance, which are required to understand potential mitigation measures. Likewise, individual differences in response to noise (especially via perceptual mechanisms) are likely widespread, but lacking in empirical data. Here we use the echolocating bat Phyllostomus discolor, a trained discrimination task, and experimental noise playback to explicitly test perceptual mechanisms of noise disturbance. We demonstrate high individual variability in response to noise treatments and evidence for multiple perceptual mechanisms. Additionally, we highlight that only some individuals were able to cope with noise, while others were not. We tested for changes in echolocation call duration, amplitude, and peak frequency as possible ways of coping with noise. Although all bats strongly increased call amplitude and showed additional minor changes in call duration and frequency, these changes could not explain the differences in coping and non-coping individuals. Our understanding of noise disturbance needs to become more mechanistic and individualistic as research knowledge is transformed into policy changes and conservation action. ©2020 Gomes and Goerlitz.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2-AFC; Anthropogenic noise; Chiroptera; Discrimination task; Echolocation; Mechanism; Phyllostomidae

Year:  2020        PMID: 33384901      PMCID: PMC7751433          DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PeerJ        ISSN: 2167-8359            Impact factor:   2.984


  43 in total

1.  The effect of temporal structure on rustling-sound detection in the gleaning bat, Megaderma lyra.

Authors:  M Hübner; L Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Comparing passive and active hearing: spectral analysis of transient sounds in bats.

Authors:  Holger R Goerlitz; Mathias Hübner; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Urban noise and the cultural evolution of bird songs.

Authors:  David Luther; Luis Baptista
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The Lombard effect emerges early in young bats: implications for the development of audio-vocal integration.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Andrea Lingner; Uwe Firzlaff; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Dip listening and the cocktail party problem in grey treefrogs: Signal recognition in temporally fluctuating noise.

Authors:  Alejandro Vélez; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Bats perceptually weight prey cues across sensory systems when hunting in noise.

Authors:  D G E Gomes; R A Page; I Geipel; R C Taylor; M J Ryan; W Halfwerk
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Psychophysical and neurophysiological hearing thresholds in the bat Phyllostomus discolor.

Authors:  Susanne Hoffmann; Leonie Baier; Frank Borina; Gerd Schuller; Lutz Wiegrebe; Uwe Firzlaff
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Hunting at the highway: traffic noise reduces foraging efficiency in acoustic predators.

Authors:  Björn M Siemers; Andrea Schaub
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Causes and consequences of intraspecific variation in animal responses to anthropogenic noise.

Authors:  Harry R Harding; Timothy A C Gordon; Emma Eastcott; Stephen D Simpson; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.671

10.  Anthropogenic noise increases fish mortality by predation.

Authors:  Stephen D Simpson; Andrew N Radford; Sophie L Nedelec; Maud C O Ferrari; Douglas P Chivers; Mark I McCormick; Mark G Meekan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  3 in total

1.  Airport noise disturbs foraging behavior of Japanese pipistrelle bats.

Authors:  Weiwei Wang; Huimin Gao; Chengrong Li; Yingchun Deng; Daying Zhou; Yaqi Li; Wenyu Zhou; Bo Luo; Haiying Liang; Wenqin Liu; Pan Wu; Wang Jing; Jiang Feng
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-06-12       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Noise distracts foraging bats.

Authors:  Louise C Allen; Nickolay I Hristov; Juliette J Rubin; Joseph T Lightsey; Jesse R Barber
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Should I use fixed effects or random effects when I have fewer than five levels of a grouping factor in a mixed-effects model?

Authors:  Dylan G E Gomes
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.984

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.