Literature DB >> 30553023

Effective communication in the era of precision medicine: A pilot intervention with low health literacy patients to improve genetic counseling communication.

Galen Joseph1, Robin Lee2, Rena J Pasick3, Claudia Guerra4, Dean Schillinger5, Sara Rubin6.   

Abstract

Effective communication, where all parties share a common understanding, is necessary to realize the promise of Genomic Medicine. It is especially salient given the imperative to increase the participation of diverse populations in genomics research and to expand the reach of clinical genomics. We have previously shown that cancer genetic counseling is suboptimal for patients with limited health literacy. To address this finding, we implemented a pilot study to improve verbal communication between genetic counselors and their patients of limited health literacy that consisted of: i) curriculum development and delivery of a Genetic Counselors (GC) communication workshop; ii) two-month post-workshop interviews with GC participants (n = 9); iii) observations/audio recordings of counseling sessions involving 24 patients and two GC workshop participants; iv) post-counseling interviews with patients (n = 9). The 4.5-h workshop presented evidenced-based principles and strategies for effective communication with limited health literacy patients (e.g. use of plain language and teach-back), and offered specific techniques and exercises to practice adoption of such practices in the genetic counseling context. GCs expressed appreciation for the opportunity to refine their skills; however, they reported that some strategies were challenging given their professional training and communication habits. For example, GCs were concerned that use of plain language could undermine efforts to obtain informed consent and provide scientifically accurate information. Observations and patient interviews after the workshop revealed that GCs were able to employ the communication strategies with positive effects, with patients indicating sufficient understanding of the genetic test and its implications as well as satisfaction with the counselors' communication. While derived from research on communication with those of limited health literacy, the communication approaches taught in the GC workshop could benefit most patients, given the high rates of low health literacy in many countries, and the many factors beyond health literacy that can contribute to reduced comprehension in health care environments.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genomic literacy; Health disparities; Health literacy; Patient-provider communication; Practice guidelines; Psychosocial counseling

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30553023      PMCID: PMC7213493          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Med Genet        ISSN: 1769-7212            Impact factor:   2.708


  51 in total

1.  Genetic counseling issues in Latinos.

Authors:  V B Penchaszadeh
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2001

Review 2.  Health Literacy Education in Health Professions Schools: An Integrative Review.

Authors:  Coleen E Toronto; Barbara Weatherford
Journal:  J Nurs Educ       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.726

3.  Genetic counseling communication with an African American BRCA1 kindred.

Authors:  Lee Ellington; Amiee Maxwel; Bonnie J Baty; Debra Roter; William N Dudley; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 4.  Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: a critical review of empirical studies.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Jennifer Irle; Elizabeth Lobb; Kristine Barlow-Stewart
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy D Berkman; Stacey L Sheridan; Katrina E Donahue; David J Halpern; Karen Crotty
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Factors associated with genetic counseling and BRCA testing in a population-based sample of young Black women with breast cancer.

Authors:  D Cragun; D Bonner; J Kim; M R Akbari; S A Narod; A Gomez-Fuego; J D Garcia; S T Vadaparampil; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Cancer Counseling of Low-Income Limited English Proficient Latina Women Using Medical Interpreters: Implications for Shared Decision-Making.

Authors:  Daniella Kamara; Jon Weil; Janey Youngblom; Claudia Guerra; Galen Joseph
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Is "teach-back" associated with knowledge retention and hospital readmission in hospitalized heart failure patients?

Authors:  Matthew White; Roxanne Garbez; Maureen Carroll; Eileen Brinker; Jill Howie-Esquivel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.083

9.  Information Mismatch: Cancer Risk Counseling with Diverse Underserved Patients.

Authors:  Galen Joseph; Rena J Pasick; Dean Schillinger; Judith Luce; Claudia Guerra; Janice Ka Yan Cheng
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Health Literacy Universal Precautions Are Still a Distant Dream: Analysis of U.S. Data on Health Literate Practices.

Authors:  Lan Liang; Cindy Brach
Journal:  Health Lit Res Pract       Date:  2017-11-09
View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Systemic Barriers to Risk-Reducing Interventions for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Implications for Health Care Inequities.

Authors:  Kathleen F Mittendorf; Sarah Knerr; Tia L Kauffman; Nangel M Lindberg; Katherine P Anderson; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Marian J Gilmore; Jessica Ezzell Hunter; Galen Joseph; Stephanie A Kraft; Jamilyn M Zepp; Sapna Syngal; Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-11-03

2.  Adapting a Theoretically-Based intervention for underserved clinical populations at increased risk for hereditary Cancer: Lessons learned from the BRCA-Gist experience.

Authors:  Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza; Valerie F Reyna; Christopher R Wolfe; Sara Gómez-Trillos; Arnethea L Sutton; Ashleigh Brennan; Vanessa B Sheppard
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-07-05

Review 3.  Genetic Counseling and the Central Tenets of Practice.

Authors:  Barbara Biesecker
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 6.915

4.  Genetic counseling and testing for Asian Americans: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer L Young; Julie Mak; Talia Stanley; Michelle Bass; Mildred K Cho; Holly K Tabor
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  Development and early implementation of an Accessible, Relational, Inclusive and Actionable approach to genetic counseling: The ARIA model.

Authors:  Leslie Riddle; Laura M Amendola; Marian J Gilmore; Claudia Guerra; Barbara Biesecker; Tia L Kauffman; Katherine Anderson; Alan F Rope; Michael C Leo; Mikaella Caruncho; Gail P Jarvik; Benjamin Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard; Galen Joseph
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2020-12-23

Review 6.  A review and definition of 'usual care' in genetic counseling trials to standardize use in research.

Authors:  Barbara B Biesecker; Sarah E Lillie; Laura M Amendola; Katherine E Donohue; Kelly M East; Ann Katherine M Foreman; Marian J Gilmore; Veronica Greve; Billie Liangolou; Julianne M O'Daniel; Jacqueline A Odgis; Shannon Rego; Bradley Rolf; Sarah Scollon; Sabrina A Suckiel; Jamilyn Zepp; Galen Joseph
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  A systematic review of communication interventions to help healthcare professionals discuss genetic testing for breast cancer.

Authors:  Rachel Starkings; Valerie Shilling; Valerie Jenkins; Lesley Fallowfield
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Physician Communication and Patient Understanding of Molecular Testing Terminology.

Authors:  Shannon M Blee; Rachel Pocock Shah; Ana P M Pinheiro; Jeffrey Switchenko; Margie Dixon; Taofeek K Owonikoko; Charles E Hill; Stephen M Szabo; Rebecca D Pentz
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-08-24

9.  Clinician Factors Rather Than Patient Factors Affect Discussion of Treatment Options.

Authors:  Bastiaan T van Hoorn; Luke X van Rossenberg; Xander Jacobs; George S I Sulkers; Mark van Heijl; David Ring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  Disparities in precision medicine-Examining germline genetic counseling and testing patterns among men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hala T Borno; Anobel Y Odisho; Christine M Gunn; Magdalena Pankowska; Jennifer R Rider
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.954

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.