Literature DB >> 11326157

[Screening of Chlamydia trachomatis: is the diagnostic efficacy good enough?].

C Niederhauser1, C Honegger, L Kaempf.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In the background of discrepant results of C. trachomatis testing in women with suspected genital infections, three different tests have been compared.
METHOD: 594 endocervical swabs were collected from women visiting the family planning clinic in Aarau. Each of the following tests was evaluated: Cobas Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis, IF Chlamyset, and Chlamydia IF direct. If one of these three tests was positive, the fixed material on the slides was scraped off, and a PCR was performed.
RESULTS: 15 out of 594 samples were "true'-positive. PCR recognized 14 of them, the IF Chlamyset 13, and the Chlamydia IF 8. With the IF Chlamyset 37 samples were false-positive.
CONCLUSIONS: PCR testing exhibits a good sensitivity and a high specificity, but we think that the sensitivity can be increased by improving the sample preparation step. The Chlamydia IF direct has a good specificity, but a rather low sensitivity. It should be noted that the PCR has the potential to become a new gold standard for the detection of C. trachomatis. Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11326157     DOI: 10.1159/000053015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch        ISSN: 1018-8843


  1 in total

1.  Improved sensitivity of the Chlamydia trachomatis Cobas Amplicor assay using an optimized procedure for preparation of specimens.

Authors:  C Niederhauser; L Kaempf
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 3.267

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.