Literature DB >> 12597186

Patterns of phoneme perception errors by listeners with cochlear implants as a function of overall speech perception ability.

Benjamin Munson1, Gail S Donaldson, Shanna L Allen, Elizabeth A Collison, David A Nelson.   

Abstract

Many studies have noted great variability in speech perception ability among postlingually deafened adults with cochlear implants. This study examined phoneme misperceptions for 30 cochlear implant listeners using either the Nucleus-22 or Clarion version 1.2 device to examine whether listeners with better overall speech perception differed qualitatively from poorer listeners in their perception of vowel and consonant features. In the first analysis, simple regressions were used to predict the mean percent-correct scores for consonants and vowels for the better group of listeners from those of the poorer group. A strong relationship between the two groups was found for consonant identification, and a weak, nonsignificant relationship was found for vowel identification. In the second analysis, it was found that less information was transmitted for consonant and vowel features to the poorer listeners than to the better listeners; however, the pattern of information transmission was similar across groups. Taken together, results suggest that the performance difference between the two groups is primarily quantitative. The results underscore the importance of examining individuals' perception of individual phoneme features when attempting to relate speech perception to other predictor variables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12597186     DOI: 10.1121/1.1536630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Production of contrast between sibilant fricatives by children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Jan R Edwards; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of Age and Cochlear Implantation on Spectrally Cued Speech Categorization.

Authors:  Mishaela DiNino; Julie G Arenberg; Anne L R Duchen; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Auditory-visual speech perception in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Sheetal Desai; Ginger Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speech Rate Normalization and Phonemic Boundary Perception in Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Brittany N Jaekel; Rochelle S Newman; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  [Phoneme discrimination training with experienced cochlear implant listeners].

Authors:  A Schumann; T Liebscher; U Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Using speech sounds to test functional spectral resolution in listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Perceptual weighting of acoustic cues for accommodating gender-related talker differences heard by listeners with normal hearing and with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Ashley N Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Lexical bias in word recognition by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Steven P Gianakas; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The Acoustics of Word-Initial Fricatives and Their Effect on Word-Level Intelligibility in Children With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Patrick F Reidy; Kayla Kristensen; Matthew B Winn; Ruth Y Litovsky; Jan R Edwards
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Vowel discrimination by hearing infants as a function of number of spectral channels.

Authors:  Andrea D Warner-Czyz; Derek M Houston; Linda S Hynan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.