Literature DB >> 18177171

Auditory-visual speech perception in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Sheetal Desai1, Ginger Stickney, Fan-Gang Zeng.   

Abstract

The present study evaluated auditory-visual speech perception in cochlear-implant users as well as normal-hearing and simulated-implant controls to delineate relative contributions of sensory experience and cues. Auditory-only, visual-only, or auditory-visual speech perception was examined in the context of categorical perception, in which an animated face mouthing ba, da, or ga was paired with synthesized phonemes from an 11-token auditory continuum. A three-alternative, forced-choice method was used to yield percent identification scores. Normal-hearing listeners showed sharp phoneme boundaries and strong reliance on the auditory cue, whereas actual and simulated implant listeners showed much weaker categorical perception but stronger dependence on the visual cue. The implant users were able to integrate both congruent and incongruent acoustic and optical cues to derive relatively weak but significant auditory-visual integration. This auditory-visual integration was correlated with the duration of the implant experience but not the duration of deafness. Compared with the actual implant performance, acoustic simulations of the cochlear implant could predict the auditory-only performance but not the auditory-visual integration. These results suggest that both altered sensory experience and improvised acoustic cues contribute to the auditory-visual speech perception in cochlear-implant users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18177171      PMCID: PMC2662523          DOI: 10.1121/1.2816573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  68 in total

1.  Consonant recordings for speech testing.

Authors:  R V Shannon; A Jensvold; M Padilla; M E Robert; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users: effects of implant experience and duration of deafness.

Authors:  Kevin M J Green; Peter J Julyan; David L Hastings; Richard T Ramsden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Evidence that cochlear-implanted deaf patients are better multisensory integrators.

Authors:  J Rouger; S Lagleyre; B Fraysse; S Deneve; O Deguine; P Barone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Crossmodal integration in the identification of consonant segments.

Authors:  L D Braida
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-08

5.  Selected cognitive factors and speech recognition performance among young and elderly listeners.

Authors:  S Gordon-Salant; P J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Auditory-visual speech perception and aging.

Authors:  Kathleen M Cienkowski; Arlene Earley Carney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Use of visual information for phonetic perception.

Authors:  Q Summerfield
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.759

8.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Auditory-visual fusion in speech perception in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Efrat A Schorr; Nathan A Fox; Virginie van Wassenhove; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Encoding voice pitch for profoundly hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  K W Grant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  24 in total

1.  The Effect of Residual Acoustic Hearing and Adaptation to Uncertainty on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Ashley Farris-Trimble; Michael Seedorff; Hannah Rigler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Audio-visual speech intelligibility benefits with bilateral cochlear implants when talker location varies.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-01-13

3.  A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study of the Impact of Online Music Training on Pitch and Timbre Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Nicole T Jiam; Mickael L Deroche; Patpong Jiradejvong; Charles J Limb
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-02-27

4.  Acoustic noise and vision differentially warp the auditory categorization of speech.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Lauren Sigley; Gwyneth A Lewis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  McGurk stimuli for the investigation of multisensory integration in cochlear implant users: The Oldenburg Audio Visual Speech Stimuli (OLAVS).

Authors:  Maren Stropahl; Sebastian Schellhardt; Stefan Debener
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

6.  Experiments on Auditory-Visual Perception of Sentences by Users of Unilateral, Bimodal, and Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Julie Liss; Shuai Wang; Visar Berisha; Cimarron Ludwig; Sarah Cook Natale
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 7.  Speech Understanding in Complex Listening Environments by Listeners Fit With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Rene H Gifford
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Lexical bias in word recognition by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Steven P Gianakas; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Evolution of crossmodal reorganization of the voice area in cochlear-implanted deaf patients.

Authors:  Julien Rouger; Sébastien Lagleyre; Jean-François Démonet; Bernard Fraysse; Olivier Deguine; Pascal Barone
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Visual Temporal Acuity Is Related to Auditory Speech Perception Abilities in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn; Ryan A Stevenson; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.