Literature DB >> 12592503

Encoding, learning, and spatial updating of multiple object locations specified by 3-D sound, spatial language, and vision.

Roberta L Klatzky1, Yvonne Lippa, Jack M Loomis, Reginald G Golledge.   

Abstract

Participants standing at an origin learned the distance and azimuth of target objects that were specified by 3-D sound, spatial language, or vision. We tested whether the ensuing target representations functioned equivalently across modalities for purposes of spatial updating. In experiment 1, participants localized targets by pointing to each and verbalizing its distance, both directly from the origin and at an indirect waypoint. In experiment 2, participants localized targets by walking to each directly from the origin and via an indirect waypoint. Spatial updating bias was estimated by the spatial-coordinate difference between indirect and direct localization; noise from updating was estimated by the difference in variability of localization. Learning rate and noise favored vision over the two auditory modalities. For all modalities, bias during updating tended to move targets forward, comparably so for three and five targets and for forward and rightward indirect-walking directions. Spatial language produced additional updating bias and noise from updating. Although spatial representations formed from language afford updating, they do not function entirely equivalently to those from intrinsically spatial modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12592503     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1334-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  20 in total

1.  Learning directions of objects specified by vision, spatial audition, or auditory spatial language.

Authors:  Roberta L Klatzky; Yvonne Lippa; Jack M Loomis; Reginald G Golledge
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Descriptions and depictions of environments.

Authors:  H A Taylor; B Tversky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-09

3.  Visually perceived location is an invariant in the control of action.

Authors:  J W Philbeck; J M Loomis; A C Beall
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-05

4.  Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation.

Authors:  J J Rieser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Parietal lobe mechanisms of spatial attention: modality-specific or supramodal?

Authors:  M J Farah; A B Wong; M A Monheit; L A Morrow
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Comparison of nine methods of indicating the direction to objects: data from blind adults.

Authors:  L Haber; R N Haber; S Penningroth; K Novak; H Radgowski
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Properties of cognitive maps constructed from texts.

Authors:  E L Ferguson; M Hegarty
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-07

8.  Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion?

Authors:  J A Thomson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Maintenance of orientation during locomotion in unfamiliar environments.

Authors:  A Böök; T Gärling
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Updating after rotational and translational body movements: coordinate structure of perspective space.

Authors:  C C Presson; D R Montello
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Building a cognitive map by assembling multiple path integration systems.

Authors:  Ranxiao Frances Wang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

2.  Visual and haptic representations of scenes are updated with observer movement.

Authors:  Achille Pasqualotto; Ciara M Finucane; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Mental concatenation of perceptually and cognitively specified depth to represent locations in near space.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Roberta L Klatzky; Damion Shelton; George Stetten
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Non-sensory inputs to angular path integration.

Authors:  Joeanna C Arthur; John W Philbeck; David Chichka
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Spatial Representations From Perception and Cognitive Mediation: The Case of Ultrasound.

Authors:  Roberta L Klatzky; Bing Wu; George Stetten
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-12

6.  Dependence of auditory spatial updating on vestibular, proprioceptive, and efference copy signals.

Authors:  Daria Genzel; Uwe Firzlaff; Lutz Wiegrebe; Paul R MacNeilage
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Spatial working memory for locations specified by vision and audition: testing the amodality hypothesis.

Authors:  Jack M Loomis; Roberta L Klatzky; Brendan McHugh; Nicholas A Giudice
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Functional equivalence of spatial images from touch and vision: evidence from spatial updating in blind and sighted individuals.

Authors:  Nicholas A Giudice; Maryann R Betty; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Learning to Reach to Locations Encoded from Imaging Displays.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Roberta L Klatzky; George Stetten
Journal:  Spat Cogn Comput       Date:  2008-10

10.  Perception of 3-D location based on vision, touch, and extended touch.

Authors:  Nicholas A Giudice; Roberta L Klatzky; Christopher R Bennett; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.