Literature DB >> 22552825

Spatial working memory for locations specified by vision and audition: testing the amodality hypothesis.

Jack M Loomis1, Roberta L Klatzky, Brendan McHugh, Nicholas A Giudice.   

Abstract

Spatial working memory can maintain representations from vision, hearing, and touch, representations referred to here as spatial images. The present experiment addressed whether spatial images from vision and hearing that are simultaneously present within working memory retain modality-specific tags or are amodal. Observers were presented with short sequences of targets varying in angular direction, with the targets in a given sequence being all auditory, all visual, or a sequential mixture of the two. On two thirds of the trials, one of the locations was repeated, and observers had to respond as quickly as possible when detecting this repetition. Ancillary detection and localization tasks confirmed that the visual and auditory targets were perceptually comparable. Response latencies in the working memory task showed small but reliable costs in performance on trials involving a sequential mixture of auditory and visual targets, as compared with trials of pure vision or pure audition. These deficits were statistically reliable only for trials on which the modalities of the matching location switched from the penultimate to the final target in the sequence, indicating a switching cost. The switching cost for the pair in immediate succession means that the spatial images representing the target locations retain features of the visual or auditory representations from which they were derived. However, there was no reliable evidence of a performance cost for mixed modalities in the matching pair when the second of the two did not immediately follow the first, suggesting that more enduring spatial images in working memory may be amodal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22552825      PMCID: PMC3482114          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-012-0311-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  29 in total

1.  Modality-specific frontal and parietal areas for auditory and visual spatial localization in humans.

Authors:  K O Bushara; R A Weeks; K Ishii; M J Catalan; B Tian; J P Rauschecker; M Hallett
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; J Jonides
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge.

Authors:  R D Easton; M J Sholl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Activation of the primary visual cortex by Braille reading in blind subjects.

Authors:  N Sadato; A Pascual-Leone; J Grafman; V Ibañez; M P Deiber; G Dold; M Hallett
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Visual signals bias auditory targets in azimuth and depth.

Authors:  Amanda L Bowen; Ramnarayan Ramachandran; Jeffrey A Muday; James A Schirillo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Between reality and imagination: when is spatial updating automatic?

Authors:  Ranxiao Frances Wang
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-01

7.  Functional equivalence of spatial representations derived from vision and language: evidence from allocentric judgments.

Authors:  Marios N Avraamides; Jack M Loomis; Roberta L Klatzky; Reginald G Golledge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Imagery, action, and young children's spatial orientation: it's not being there that counts, it's what one has in mind.

Authors:  J J Rieser; A E Garing; M F Young
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1994-10

9.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of human prefrontal cortex activation during a spatial working memory task.

Authors:  G McCarthy; A M Blamire; A Puce; A C Nobre; G Bloch; F Hyder; P Goldman-Rakic; R G Shulman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-08-30       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Spatial working memory in humans as revealed by PET.

Authors:  J Jonides; E E Smith; R A Koeppe; E Awh; S Minoshima; M A Mintun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-06-17       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  11 in total

1.  Visual, haptic and bimodal scene perception: evidence for a unitary representation.

Authors:  Helene Intraub; Frank Morelli; Kristin M Gagnier
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-02-25

2.  Multipurpose Spatiomotor Capture System for Haptic and Visual Training and Testing in the Blind and Sighted.

Authors:  Lora T Likova; Kristyo N Mineff; Christopher W Tyler
Journal:  IS&T Int Symp Electron Imaging       Date:  2021

3.  Development of Visual Memory Capacity Following Early-Onset and Extended Blindness.

Authors:  Priti Gupta; Pragya Shah; Sharon Gilad Gutnick; Marin Vogelsang; Lukas Vogelsang; Kashish Tiwari; Tapan Gandhi; Suma Ganesh; Pawan Sinha
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2022-05-09

4.  Perception of 3-D location based on vision, touch, and extended touch.

Authors:  Nicholas A Giudice; Roberta L Klatzky; Christopher R Bennett; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Navigation using sensory substitution in real and virtual mazes.

Authors:  Daniel-Robert Chebat; Shachar Maidenbaum; Amir Amedi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Spatial navigation by congenitally blind individuals.

Authors:  Victor R Schinazi; Tyler Thrash; Daniel-Robert Chebat
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-12-18

7.  Visual and Auditory Spatial Localization in Younger and Older Adults.

Authors:  Ying-Zi Xiong; Douglas A Addleman; Nam Anh Nguyen; Peggy B Nelson; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 5.702

8.  The interaction of vision and audition in two-dimensional space.

Authors:  Martine Godfroy-Cooper; Patrick M B Sandor; Joel D Miller; Robert B Welch
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Aging and Sensory Substitution in a Virtual Navigation Task.

Authors:  S Levy-Tzedek; S Maidenbaum; A Amedi; J Lackner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Touching and Hearing Unseen Objects: Multisensory Effects on Scene Recognition.

Authors:  Simon J Hazenberg; Rob van Lier
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-08-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.