Literature DB >> 9158334

Visually perceived location is an invariant in the control of action.

J W Philbeck1, J M Loomis, A C Beall.   

Abstract

We provide experimental evidence that perceived location is an invariant in the control of action, by showing that different actions are directed toward a single visually specified location in space (corresponding to the putative perceived location) and that this single location, although specified by a fixed physical target, varies with the availability of information about the distance of that target. Observers in two conditions varying in the availability of egocentric distance cues viewed targets at 1.5, 3.1, or 6.0 m and then attempted to walk to the target with eyes closed using one of three paths; the path was not specified until after vision was occluded. The observers stopped at about the same location regardless of the path taken, providing evidence that action was being controlled by some invariant, ostensibly visually perceived location. That it was indeed perceived location was indicated by the manipulation of information about target distance--the trajectories in the full-cues condition converged near the physical target locations, whereas those in the reduced-cues condition converged at locations consistent with the usual perceptual errors found when distance cues are impoverished.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9158334     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  25 in total

1.  Dissociation between location and shape in visual space.

Authors:  Jack M Loomis; John W Philbeck; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  How a cognitive psychologist came to seek universal laws.

Authors:  Roger N Shepard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

3.  Going the distance: spatial scale of athletic experience affects the accuracy of path integration.

Authors:  Alastair D Smith; Christina J Howard; Niall Alcock; Kirsten Cater
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Variability in stepping direction explains the veering behavior of blind walkers.

Authors:  Christopher S Kallie; Paul R Schrater; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The social psychology of perception experiments: hills, backpacks, glucose, and the problem of generalizability.

Authors:  Frank H Durgin; Brennan Klein; Ariana Spiegel; Cassandra J Strawser; Morgan Williams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  An older view on distance perception: older adults perceive walkable extents as farther.

Authors:  Mila Sugovic; Jessica K Witt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The development of path integration: combining estimations of distance and heading.

Authors:  Alastair D Smith; Laura McKeith; Christina J Howard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Planning paths to multiple targets: memory involvement and planning heuristics in spatial problem solving.

Authors:  J M Wiener; N N Ehbauer; H A Mallot
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-08

9.  Tachistoscopic exposure and masking of real three-dimensional scenes.

Authors:  Stephen Pothier; John Philbeck; David Chichka; Daniel A Gajewski
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-02

10.  Perception of 3-D location based on vision, touch, and extended touch.

Authors:  Nicholas A Giudice; Roberta L Klatzky; Christopher R Bennett; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.