Literature DB >> 12587097

Undetected genotyping errors cause apparent overtransmission of common alleles in the transmission/disequilibrium test.

Adele A Mitchell1, David J Cutler, Aravinda Chakravarti.   

Abstract

The transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT), a family-based test of linkage and association, is a popular and intuitive statistical test for studies of complex inheritance, as it is nonparametric and robust to population stratification. We carried out a literature search and located 79 significant TDT-derived associations between a microsatellite marker allele and a disease. Among these, there were 31 (39%) in which the most common allele was found to exhibit distorted transmission to affected offspring, implying that the allele may be associated with either susceptibility to or protection from a disease. In 27 of these 31 studies (87%), the most common allele appeared to be overtransmitted to affected offspring (a risk factor), and, in the remaining 4 studies, the most common allele appeared to be undertransmitted (a protective factor). In a second literature search, we identified 92 case-control studies in which a microsatellite marker allele was found to have significantly different frequencies in case and control groups. Of these, there were 37 instances (40%) in which the most common allele was involved. In 12 of these 37 studies (32%), the most common allele was enriched in cases relative to controls (a risk factor), and, in the remaining 25 studies, the most common allele was enriched in controls (a protective factor). Thus, the most common allele appears to be a risk factor when identified through the TDT, and it appears to be protective when identified through case-control analysis. To understand this phenomenon, we incorporated an error model into the calculation of the TDT statistic. We show that undetected genotyping error can cause apparent transmission distortion at markers with alleles of unequal frequency. We demonstrate that this distortion is in the direction of overtransmission for common alleles. Therefore, we conclude that undetected genotyping errors may be contributing to an inflated false-positive rate among reported TDT-derived associations and that genotyping fidelity must be increased.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12587097      PMCID: PMC1180236          DOI: 10.1086/368203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  24 in total

1.  Assessment and management of single nucleotide polymorphism genotype errors in genetic association analysis.

Authors:  D Gordon; J Ott
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2001

2.  True pedigree errors more frequent than apparent errors for single nucleotide polymorphisms.

Authors:  D Gordon; S C Heath; J Ott
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 0.444

3.  Identification and analysis of error types in high-throughput genotyping.

Authors:  K R Ewen; M Bahlo; S A Treloar; D F Levinson; B Mowry; J W Barlow; S J Foote
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-08-02       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Detection and integration of genotyping errors in statistical genetics.

Authors:  Eric Sobel; Jeanette C Papp; Kenneth Lange
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Probability of detection of genotyping errors and mutations as inheritance inconsistencies in nuclear-family data.

Authors:  Julie A Douglas; Andrew D Skol; Michael Boehnke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  A transmission/disequilibrium test that allows for genotyping errors in the analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphism data.

Authors:  D Gordon; S C Heath; X Liu; J Ott
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  High-throughput variation detection and genotyping using microarrays.

Authors:  D J Cutler; M E Zwick; M M Carrasquillo; C T Yohn; K P Tobin; C Kashuk; D J Mathews; N A Shah; E E Eichler; J A Warrington; A Chakravarti
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  The effect that genotyping errors have on the robustness of common linkage-disequilibrium measures.

Authors:  J M Akey; K Zhang; M Xiong; P Doris; L Jin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-05-16       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Linkage analysis in the presence of errors II: marker-locus genotyping errors modeled with hypercomplex recombination fractions.

Authors:  H H Göring; J D Terwilliger
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  PCR amplification introduces errors into mononucleotide and dinucleotide repeat sequences.

Authors:  L A Clarke; C S Rebelo; J Gonçalves; M G Boavida; P Jordan
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  2001-10
View more
  63 in total

1.  Replication in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Peter Kraft; Eleftheria Zeggini; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 2.901

2.  Family-based association tests using genotype data with uncertainty.

Authors:  Zhaoxia Yu
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and endometrial cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  De-Ke Jiang; Lei Yao; Wei-Hua Ren; Wen-Zhang Wang; Bo Peng; Long Yu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 4.  Recent developments in genomewide association scans: a workshop summary and review.

Authors:  Duncan C Thomas; Robert W Haile; David Duggan
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 5.  Factors affecting statistical power in the detection of genetic association.

Authors:  Derek Gordon; Stephen J Finch
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Current evidence on the relationship between SNP309 polymorphism in the MDM2 gene and colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Guoqiang Zhang; Hongwei Chen; Youwei Zheng; Jing Cheng
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-08-03

Review 7.  A HapMap harvest of insights into the genetics of common disease.

Authors:  Teri A Manolio; Lisa D Brooks; Francis S Collins
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Association of synapsin 2 with schizophrenia in families of Northern European ancestry.

Authors:  Viatcheslav Saviouk; Michael P Moreau; Irina V Tereshchenko; Linda M Brzustowicz
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Genotyping error detection in samples of unrelated individuals without replicate genotyping.

Authors:  Nianjun Liu; Dabao Zhang; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 0.444

10.  Strengthening the reporting of genetic association studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE Statement.

Authors:  Julian Little; Julian P T Higgins; John P A Ioannidis; David Moher; France Gagnon; Erik von Elm; Muin J Khoury; Barbara Cohen; George Davey-Smith; Jeremy Grimshaw; Paul Scheet; Marta Gwinn; Robin E Williamson; Guang Yong Zou; Kim Hutchings; Candice Y Johnson; Valerie Tait; Miriam Wiens; Jean Golding; Cornelia van Duijn; John McLaughlin; Andrew Paterson; George Wells; Isabel Fortier; Matthew Freedman; Maja Zecevic; Richard King; Claire Infante-Rivard; Alex Stewart; Nick Birkett
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.