Literature DB >> 20552298

TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and endometrial cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

De-Ke Jiang1, Lei Yao, Wei-Hua Ren, Wen-Zhang Wang, Bo Peng, Long Yu.   

Abstract

Studies investigating the relationship between TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and endometrial cancer risk reported conflicting results. To explore a more precise estimate of the effect of this polymorphism on endometrial carcinogenesis, a meta-analysis was performed by searching eligible studies in PubMed. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the association for codominant model (Arg/Arg vs. Pro/Pro, Arg/Pro vs. Pro/Pro), dominant model (Arg/Arg+Arg/Pro vs. Pro/Pro), and recessive model (Arg/Arg vs. Arg/Pro+Pro/Pro), respectively. Subgroup analyses were performed by Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in controls, the specimen of cases for determining TP53 genotypes, sample size, the source of control and case groups, and ethnicity. We identified 8 case-control studies involving 2,154 subjects for this meta-analysis. Overall, no evidence of association was observed between TP53 genotypes and endometrial cancer risk in all genetic models (Arg/Arg vs. Pro/Pro: OR=0.98, 95% CI: 0.69-1.39, P=0.90; Arg/Pro vs. Pro/Pro: OR=1.00, 95% CI: 0.71-1.42, P=0.98; dominant model: OR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.71-1.38, P=0.95; recessive model: OR=1.06, 95% CI: 0.80-1.41, P=0.95). Stratified analyses also detected no significant association in any subgroup, except among those studies with controls deviated from HWE in recessive model (OR=1.60, 95% CI: 1.07-2.39). In conclusion, we did not observe any evidence for a role of TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism in endometrial cancer. The reported significant association between this polymorphism and endometrial cancer risk may be due to methodological errors such as selection bias, small sample size, Type I error, and population stratification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20552298     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-010-9597-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  40 in total

1.  Undetected genotyping errors cause apparent overtransmission of common alleles in the transmission/disequilibrium test.

Authors:  Adele A Mitchell; David J Cutler; Aravinda Chakravarti
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  P53 is a tumor suppressor gene.

Authors:  Arnold J Levine; Cathy A Finlay; Philip W Hinds
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Detection of genotyping errors by Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium testing.

Authors:  Louise Hosking; Sheena Lumsden; Karen Lewis; Astrid Yeo; Linda McCarthy; Aruna Bansal; John Riley; Ian Purvis; Chun-Fang Xu
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  A method for meta-analysis of molecular association studies.

Authors:  Ammarin Thakkinstian; Patrick McElduff; Catherine D'Este; David Duffy; John Attia
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Association of p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphism at exon 2 and p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism with the risk of endometrial cancer in Japanese subjects.

Authors:  Yoshimitsu Niwa; Kaoru Hirose; Keitaro Matsuo; Kazuo Tajima; Yoko Ikoma; Toru Nakanishi; Akihiro Nawa; Kazuo Kuzuya; Akiko Tamakoshi; Nobuyuki Hamajima
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 8.679

6.  Two polymorphic variants of wild-type p53 differ biochemically and biologically.

Authors:  M Thomas; A Kalita; S Labrecque; D Pim; L Banks; G Matlashewski
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Association of p53 mutations and a codon 72 single nucleotide polymorphism with lower overall survival and responsiveness to adjuvant radiotherapy in endometrioid endometrial carcinomas.

Authors:  B Saffari; L Bernstein; D C Hong; J Sullivan-Halley; I B Runnebaum; H-J Grill; L A Jones; A El-Naggar; M F Press
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.437

8.  p53 and p21 genetic polymorphisms and susceptibility to endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Ju Won Roh; Jae Weon Kim; Noh Hyun Park; Yong Sang Song; In Ae Park; Sang-Yoon Park; Soon Beom Kang; Hyo Pyo Lee
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 9.  Hormonal carcinogenesis and socio-biological development factors in endometrial cancer: a clinical review.

Authors:  Andrea Tinelli; Daniele Vergara; Roberta Martignago; Giuseppe Leo; Antonio Malvasi; Raffaele Tinelli
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 10.  p53 polymorphisms: cancer implications.

Authors:  Catherine Whibley; Paul D P Pharoah; Monica Hollstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 60.716

View more
  4 in total

1.  Assessment of the XPC (A2920C), XPF (T30028C), TP53 (Arg72Pro) and GSTP1 (Ile105Val) polymorphisms in the risk of cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Cristiane Oliveira; José Augusto Rinck-Junior; Gustavo Jacob Lourenço; Aparecida Machado Moraes; Carmen Silvia Passos Lima
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  The Expression Levels of XLF and Mutant P53 Are Inversely Correlated in Head and Neck Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Sizhe Feng; Ramin Rabii; Guobiao Liang; Chenxi Song; Wei Chen; Mian Guo; Xuezhong Wei; Diana Messadi; Shen Hu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 4.207

3.  Detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA prevalence and p53 codon 72 (Arg72Pro) polymorphism in prostate cancer in a Greek group of patients.

Authors:  Vasiliki Michopoulou; Stavros P Derdas; Emmanouil Symvoulakis; Nikolaos Mourmouras; Alexandros Nomikos; Dimitris Delakas; George Sourvinos; Demetrios A Spandidos
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-09-12

4.  Comparative study and meta-analysis of meta-analysis studies for the correlation of genomic markers with early cancer detection.

Authors:  Zoi Lanara; Efstathia Giannopoulou; Marta Fullen; Evangelos Kostantinopoulos; Jean-Christophe Nebel; Haralabos P Kalofonos; George P Patrinos; Cristiana Pavlidis
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 4.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.