Literature DB >> 10077724

True pedigree errors more frequent than apparent errors for single nucleotide polymorphisms.

D Gordon1, S C Heath, J Ott.   

Abstract

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are currently being developed for use in disequilibrium analyses. These SNPs consist of two alleles with varying degrees of polymorphism. A natural design for use with SNPs is the 'haplotype relative risk' sampling design in which a father, mother, and child are typed at an SNP locus. Given such a trio of genotypes, we ask: what is the probability that a pedigree error (a change from one allele to the other) at an SNP locus will be detected using only Mendel's laws as a check? We calculate the probability of detecting such errors for a hypothetical SNP locus with varying degrees of polymorphism and for various true error rates. For the sets of allele frequencies considered, we find that the detection rates range between 25 and 30%, the detection rate being lowest when the two alleles have equal frequencies and the highest when one allele has a frequency of 10%. Based on this detection rate, we determine that the true error rate is roughly 3.3-4 times that of the apparent error rate at an SNP locus. The greatest discrepancy between true and apparent error rates occurs when allele frequencies are equal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10077724     DOI: 10.1159/000022846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Hered        ISSN: 0001-5652            Impact factor:   0.444


  27 in total

1.  Detection and integration of genotyping errors in statistical genetics.

Authors:  Eric Sobel; Jeanette C Papp; Kenneth Lange
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Probability of detection of genotyping errors and mutations as inheritance inconsistencies in nuclear-family data.

Authors:  Julie A Douglas; Andrew D Skol; Michael Boehnke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  A transmission/disequilibrium test that allows for genotyping errors in the analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphism data.

Authors:  D Gordon; S C Heath; X Liu; J Ott
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Undetected genotyping errors cause apparent overtransmission of common alleles in the transmission/disequilibrium test.

Authors:  Adele A Mitchell; David J Cutler; Aravinda Chakravarti
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  SNP genotyping on a genome-wide amplified DOP-PCR template.

Authors:  Struan F A Grant; Simone Steinlicht; Ulrike Nentwich; Rainer Kern; Barbara Burwinkel; Ralf Tolle
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Impact of genotyping errors on type I error rate of the haplotype-sharing transmission/disequilibrium test (HS-TDT).

Authors:  Michael Knapp; Tim Becker
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Detection of genotyping errors and pseudo-SNPs via deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

Authors:  Suzanne M Leal
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 8.  Factors affecting statistical power in the detection of genetic association.

Authors:  Derek Gordon; Stephen J Finch
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Genotyping error detection in samples of unrelated individuals without replicate genotyping.

Authors:  Nianjun Liu; Dabao Zhang; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 0.444

10.  Deviations from hardy-weinberg equilibrium in parental and unaffected sibling genotype data.

Authors:  Bingshan Li; Suzanne M Leal
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 0.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.