Literature DB >> 22156512

Family-based association tests using genotype data with uncertainty.

Zhaoxia Yu1.   

Abstract

Family-based association studies have been widely used to identify association between diseases and genetic markers. It is known that genotyping uncertainty is inherent in both directly genotyped or sequenced DNA variations and imputed data in silico. The uncertainty can lead to genotyping errors and missingness and can negatively impact the power and Type I error rates of family-based association studies even if the uncertainty is independent of disease status. Compared with studies using unrelated subjects, there are very few methods that address the issue of genotyping uncertainty for family-based designs. The limited attempts have mostly been made to correct the bias caused by genotyping errors. Without properly addressing the issue, the conventional testing strategy, i.e. family-based association tests using called genotypes, can yield invalid statistical inferences. Here, we propose a new test to address the challenges in analyzing case-parents data by using calls with high accuracy and modeling genotype-specific call rates. Our simulations show that compared with the conventional strategy and an alternative test, our new test has an improved performance in the presence of substantial uncertainty and has a similar performance when the uncertainty level is low. We also demonstrate the advantages of our new method by applying it to imputed markers from a genome-wide case-parents association study.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22156512      PMCID: PMC3297829          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxr045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  41 in total

1.  Fast and robust association tests for untyped SNPs in case-control studies.

Authors:  Andrew S Allen; Glen A Satten; Sarah L Bray; Frank Dudbridge; Michael P Epstein
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 0.444

2.  Methods for testing association between uncertain genotypes and quantitative traits.

Authors:  Zoltán Kutalik; Toby Johnson; Murielle Bochud; Vincent Mooser; Peter Vollenweider; Gérard Waeber; Dawn Waterworth; Jacques S Beckmann; Sven Bergmann
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 3.  Genotype imputation for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Jonathan Marchini; Bryan Howie
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Simultaneous genotype calling and haplotype phasing improves genotype accuracy and reduces false-positive associations for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Brian L Browning; Zhaoxia Yu
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Low-coverage sequencing: implications for design of complex trait association studies.

Authors:  Yun Li; Carlo Sidore; Hyun Min Kang; Michael Boehnke; Gonçalo R Abecasis
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  A genome-wide association study of cleft lip with and without cleft palate identifies risk variants near MAFB and ABCA4.

Authors:  Terri H Beaty; Jeffrey C Murray; Mary L Marazita; Ronald G Munger; Ingo Ruczinski; Jacqueline B Hetmanski; Kung Yee Liang; Tao Wu; Tanda Murray; M Daniele Fallin; Richard A Redett; Gerald Raymond; Holger Schwender; Sheng-Chih Jin; Margaret E Cooper; Martine Dunnwald; Maria A Mansilla; Elizabeth Leslie; Stephen Bullard; Andrew C Lidral; Lina M Moreno; Renato Menezes; Alexandre R Vieira; Aline Petrin; Allen J Wilcox; Rolv T Lie; Ethylin W Jabs; Yah Huei Wu-Chou; Philip K Chen; Hong Wang; Xiaoqian Ye; Shangzhi Huang; Vincent Yeow; Samuel S Chong; Sun Ha Jee; Bing Shi; Kaare Christensen; Mads Melbye; Kimberly F Doheny; Elizabeth W Pugh; Hua Ling; Eduardo E Castilla; Andrew E Czeizel; Lian Ma; L Leigh Field; Lawrence Brody; Faith Pangilinan; James L Mills; Anne M Molloy; Peadar N Kirke; John M Scott; James M Scott; Mauricio Arcos-Burgos; Alan F Scott
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  MaCH: using sequence and genotype data to estimate haplotypes and unobserved genotypes.

Authors:  Yun Li; Cristen J Willer; Jun Ding; Paul Scheet; Gonçalo R Abecasis
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Analysis of association at single nucleotide polymorphisms in the APOE region.

Authors:  E R Martin; J R Gilbert; E H Lai; J Riley; A R Rogala; B D Slotterbeck; C A Sipe; J M Grubber; L L Warren; P M Conneally; A M Saunders; D E Schmechel; I Purvis; M A Pericak-Vance; A D Roses; J M Vance
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 5.736

Review 9.  Model-based quality assessment and base-calling for second-generation sequencing data.

Authors:  Héctor Corrada Bravo; Rafael A Irizarry
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Missing call bias in high-throughput genotyping.

Authors:  Wenqing Fu; Yi Wang; Ying Wang; Rui Li; Rong Lin; Li Jin
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  2 in total

1.  A Joint Location-Scale Test Improves Power to Detect Associated SNPs, Gene Sets, and Pathways.

Authors:  David Soave; Harriet Corvol; Naim Panjwani; Jiafen Gong; Weili Li; Pierre-Yves Boëlle; Peter R Durie; Andrew D Paterson; Johanna M Rommens; Lisa J Strug; Lei Sun
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Re-evaluating data quality of dog mitochondrial, Y chromosomal, and autosomal SNPs genotyped by SNP array.

Authors:  Newton O Otecko; Min-Sheng Peng; He-Chuan Yang; Ya-Ping Zhang; Guo-Dong Wang
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2016-11-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.