Literature DB >> 15809795

Minimal-access surgery training in the Netherlands: a survey among residents-in-training for general surgery.

M P Schijven1, J T M Berlage, J J Jakimowicz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the state of surgical training and its possible shortcomings in minimal-access surgery (MAS) among Dutch surgical residents.
METHODS: A pretested questionnaire was distributed to all residents-in-training for general surgery in The Netherlands.
RESULTS: The questionnaire was sent to 407 surgical residents. The response rate was 65%. Overall, 87.7% of all the responders were highly interested in the autonomous performance of laparoscopic surgery. Residents interested in gastrointestinal (GI) or oncologic surgery (n = 137) are significantly more interested than residents interested in non-GI/oncologic surgery. All the residents (100%) thought it was important to be able to perform the three basic MAS procedures (diagnostic laparoscopy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and laparoscopic appendectomy) autonomously at the end of their surgical training. Other MAS procedures were considered to be advanced procedures. Gastrointestinal/oncologic residents were most interested in performing advanced MAS procedures, although only 17.8% expected to be adequately prepared at the end of their surgical training. Most residents had the opportunity to attend MAS skills education. Irrespective of the format or training method, only 26.9% of residents stated their MAS skills training was objectively evaluated. The residents thought every surgical hospital department in the Netherlands should have a surgeon specialized in laparoscopic surgery (86.9%).
CONCLUSIONS: The current study showed that Dutch residents believe it is very important to perform basic MAS autonomously. Of the GI/oncologic-interested residents, the majority want to be able to perform advanced MAS, but expect to be unable to do so at the end of their training. They attribute this discrepancy to "not having enough chance to be the first operator" and to "lack of volume of procedures in the hospital." Specific and properly implemented, monitored, and evaluated MAS skills training programs in skills laboratory settings could offer a promising environment for overcoming this discrepancy.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15809795     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-9011-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  21 in total

1.  Transfer of training in acquiring laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  P L Figert; A E Park; D B Witzke; R W Schwartz
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  The need for training opportunities in advanced laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  D W Rattner; K N Apelgren; W S Eubanks
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Virtual reality simulators: current status in acquisition and assessment of surgical skills.

Authors:  Peter H Cosman; Patrick C Cregan; Christopher J Martin; John A Cartmill
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.872

4.  Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator.

Authors:  M Schijven; J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Minimally invasive surgery training in Canada: a survey of general surgery.

Authors:  P M Chiasson; D E Pace; C M Schlachta; J Mamazza; E C Poulin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Training and educational approaches to minimally invasive surgery: state of the art.

Authors:  Adrian Park; Donald B Witzke
Journal:  Semin Laparosc Surg       Date:  2002-12

7.  Surgical endoscopy training is integral to general surgery residency and should be integrated into residency and fellowships abandoned.

Authors:  Michael S Nussbaum
Journal:  Semin Laparosc Surg       Date:  2002-12

8.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Integrating advanced laparoscopy into surgical residency training. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery: a preliminary assessment of minimally invasive surgical trainer virtual reality (MIST VR).

Authors:  A G Gallagher; N McClure; J McGuigan; I Crothers; J Browning
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  15 in total

1.  Minimally accurate nomenclature.

Authors:  S C Cunningham
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Face validation of the Simbionix LAP Mentor virtual reality training module and its applicability in the surgical curriculum.

Authors:  I D Ayodeji; M Schijven; J Jakimowicz; J W Greve
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Gynecological laparoscopy in residency training program: Dutch perspectives.

Authors:  W Kolkman; R Wolterbeek; F W Jansen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Introduction of laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer early during residency: a single institutional study on short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Satoshi Ogiso; Takashi Yamaguchi; Hiroaki Hata; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Implementation of the laparoscopic simulator in a gynecological residency curriculum.

Authors:  W Kolkman; M A J Van de Put; W B Van den Hout; J B M Z Trimbos; F W Jansen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Teaching impact in pediatric minimal access surgery: Personal perspective from "Fellow".

Authors:  Dragan Kravarusic
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.407

7.  From small acorns--developing a laparoscopic colorectal surgical service.

Authors:  J K Smith; A G Acheson; J A D Simpson; J Stewart; I J Beckingham; C B Gornall; J P Williams; M H Robinson; C A Maxwell-Armstrong
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Problems and pitfalls in modern competency-based laparoscopic training.

Authors:  M P Schijven; W A Bemelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic appendectomy performed by residents and experienced surgeons.

Authors:  Lapo Bencini; Marco Bernini; Francesco Martini; Michele Rossi; Cinzia Tommasi; Egidio Miranda; Luis Josè Sanchez; Riccardo Naspetti; Roberto Manetti; Angelo Ferrara; Silvia Nesi; Bernardo Boffi; Marco Farsi; Renato Moretti
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Virtual reality training for endoscopic surgery: voluntary or obligatory?

Authors:  K W van Dongen; W A van der Wal; I H M Borel Rinkes; M P Schijven; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.