Literature DB >> 12573067

Validation of Bateman's principles: a genetic study of sexual selection and mating patterns in the rough-skinned newt.

Adam G Jones1, J Roman Arguello, Stevan J Arnold.   

Abstract

Few studies have influenced thought on the nature of sexual selection to the extent of the classic paper of A. J. Bateman on mating patterns in Drosophila. However, interpretation of his study remains controversial, and a lack of modern empirical evidence prevents a consensus with respect to the perceived utility of Bateman's principles in the study of sexual selection. Here, we use a genetic study of natural mating patterns in the rough-skinned newt, Taricha granulosa, to investigate the concordance between Bateman's principles and the intensity of sexual selection. We found that males experienced strong sexual selection on tail height and body size, while sexual selection was undetectable in females. This direct quantification of sexual selection agreed perfectly with inferences that are based on Bateman's principles. Specifically, males (in comparison with females) exhibited greater standardized variances in reproductive and mating success, as well as a stronger relationship between mating success and reproductive success. Overall, our results illustrate that Bateman's principles provide the only quantitative measures of the mating system with explicit connections to formal selection theory and should be the central focus of studies of mating patterns in natural populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12573067      PMCID: PMC1691187          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  9 in total

1.  Measures of Inequality Are Not Equal.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Aulay Mackenzie; John D Reynolds; Jan Lindström; William J Sutherland
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  The Bateman gradient and the cause of sexual selection in a sex-role-reversed pipefish.

Authors:  A G Jones; G Rosenqvist; A Berglund; S J Arnold; J C Avise
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Some possibilities for measuring selection intensities in man.

Authors:  J F CROW
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1958-02       Impact factor: 0.553

4.  Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females.

Authors:  T H Clutton-Brock; A C Vincent
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-05-02       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Topping off: a mechanism of first-male sperm precedence in a vertebrate.

Authors:  Adam G Jones; Erika M Adams; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems.

Authors:  S T Emlen; L W Oring
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Genetic evidence for extreme polyandry and extraordinary sex-role reversal in a pipefish.

Authors:  A G Jones; D Walker; J C Avise
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  A genetic evaluation of mating system and determinants of individual reproductive success in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.).

Authors:  D Garant; J J Dodson; L Bernatchez
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.645

9.  Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations.

Authors:  T C Marshall; J Slate; L E Kruuk; J M Pemberton
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.185

  9 in total
  20 in total

1.  No evidence of sexual selection in a repetition of Bateman's classic study of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Patricia Adair Gowaty; Yong-Kyu Kim; Wyatt W Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Repetition of Bateman challenges the paradigm.

Authors:  Zuleyma Tang-Martínez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Polyandry increases offspring viability and mother productivity but does not decrease mother survival in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Patricia Adair Gowaty; Yong-Kyu Kim; Jessica Rawlings; W W Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Daniel J Rankin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Sexual selection and mating systems.

Authors:  Stephen M Shuster
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Extrapair mating and the strength of sexual selection: insights from a polymorphic species.

Authors:  Andrea S Grunst; Melissa L Grunst; Marisa L Korody; Lindsay M Forrette; Rusty A Gonser; Elaine M Tuttle
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 2.671

7.  The genetic mating system of a sea spider with male-biased sexual size dimorphism: evidence for paternity skew despite random mating success.

Authors:  Felipe S Barreto; John C Avise
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Quantitative measures of sexual selection reveal no evidence for sex-role reversal in a sea spider with prolonged paternal care.

Authors:  Felipe S Barreto; John C Avise
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Quantitative measure of sexual selection with respect to the operational sex ratio: a comparison of selection indices.

Authors:  Suzanne C Mills; Alessandro Grapputo; Esa Koskela; Tapio Mappes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Sex allocation predicts mating rate in a simultaneous hermaphrodite.

Authors:  Tim Janicke; Lukas Schärer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.