Literature DB >> 10821612

The Bateman gradient and the cause of sexual selection in a sex-role-reversed pipefish.

A G Jones1, G Rosenqvist, A Berglund, S J Arnold, J C Avise.   

Abstract

As a conspicuous evolutionary mechanism, sexual selection has received much attention from theorists and empiricists. Although the importance of the mating system to sexual selection has long been appreciated, the precise relationship remains obscure. In a classic experimental study based on parentage assessment using visible genetic markers, more than 50 years ago A. J. Bateman proposed that the cause of sexual selection in Drosophila is 'the stronger correlation, in males (relative to females), between number of mates and fertility (number of progeny)'. Half a century later, molecular genetic techniques for assigning parentage now permit mirror-image experimental tests of the 'Bateman gradient' using sex-role-reversed species. Here we show that, in the male-pregnant pipefish Syngnathus typhle, females exhibit a stronger positive association between number of mates and fertility than do males and that this relationship responds in the predicted fashion to changes in the adult sex ratio. These findings give empirical support to the idea that the relationship between mating success and number of progeny, as characterized by the Bateman gradient, is a central feature of the genetic mating system affecting the strength and direction of sexual selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10821612      PMCID: PMC1690589          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  3 in total

1.  Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females.

Authors:  T H Clutton-Brock; A C Vincent
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-05-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems.

Authors:  S T Emlen; L W Oring
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Sex differences, sex ratios and sex roles.

Authors:  I P Owens; D B Thompson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1994-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

  3 in total
  30 in total

1.  The evolution of sex differences in mate searching when females benefit: new theory and a comparative test.

Authors:  J McCartney; H Kokko; K-G Heller; D T Gwynne
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  No evidence of sexual selection in a repetition of Bateman's classic study of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Patricia Adair Gowaty; Yong-Kyu Kim; Wyatt W Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Repetition of Bateman challenges the paradigm.

Authors:  Zuleyma Tang-Martínez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Polyandry increases offspring viability and mother productivity but does not decrease mother survival in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Patricia Adair Gowaty; Yong-Kyu Kim; Jessica Rawlings; W W Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Multiple mating and its relationship to alternative modes of gestation in male-pregnant versus female-pregnant fish species.

Authors:  John C Avise; Jin-Xian Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A rigorous comparison of sexual selection indexes via simulations of diverse mating systems.

Authors:  Jonathan M Henshaw; Andrew T Kahn; Karoline Fritzsche
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Sexual selection and the differential effect of polyandry.

Authors:  Julie Collet; David S Richardson; Kirsty Worley; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Sex roles and sexual selection: lessons from a dynamic model system.

Authors:  Trond Amundsen
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.624

Review 9.  Mate choice and sexual selection: what have we learned since Darwin?

Authors:  Adam G Jones; Nicholas L Ratterman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Validation of Bateman's principles: a genetic study of sexual selection and mating patterns in the rough-skinned newt.

Authors:  Adam G Jones; J Roman Arguello; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.