Literature DB >> 19528645

Sexual selection and mating systems.

Stephen M Shuster1.   

Abstract

Sexual selection is among the most powerful of all evolutionary forces. It occurs when individuals within one sex secure mates and produce offspring at the expense of other individuals within the same sex. Darwin was first to recognize the power of sexual selection to change male and female phenotypes, and, in noting that sexual selection is nonubiquitous, Darwin was also first to recognize the importance of mating system--the "special circumstances" in which reproduction occurs within species. Analyses of mating systems since Darwin have emphasized either the genetic relationships between male and female mating elements, usually among plants, or the numbers of mates males and females may obtain, usually among animals. Combining these schemes yields a quantitative methodology that emphasizes measurement of the sex difference in the variance in relative fitness, as well as phenotypic and genetic correlations underlying reproductive traits that may arise among breeding pairs. Such information predicts the degree and direction of sexual dimorphism within species, it allows the classification of mating systems using existing genetic and life history data, and with information on the spatial and temporal distributions of fertilizations, it may also predict floral morphology in plants. Because this empirical framework identifies selective forces and genetic architectures responsible for observed male-female differences, it compliments discoveries of nucleotide sequence variation and the expression of quantitative traits. Moreover, because this methodology emphasizes the process of evolutionary change, it is easier to test and interpret than frameworks emphasizing parental investment in offspring and its presumed evolutionary outcomes.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19528645      PMCID: PMC2702802          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0901132106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  16 in total

Review 1.  Sexual selection: an evolutionary force in plants?

Authors:  Io Skogsmyr; Asa Lankinen
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2002-11

2.  Unusually dynamic sex roles in a fish.

Authors:  Elisabet Forsgren; Trond Amundsen; Asa A Borg; Jens Bjelvenmark
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The influence of territoriality and mating system on the evolution of male care: a phylogenetic study on fish.

Authors:  M Ah-King; C Kvarnemo; B S Tullberg
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Do operational sex ratios influence sex allocation in viviparous lizards with temperature-dependent sex determination?

Authors:  D J Allsop; D A Warner; T Langkilde; W DU; R Shine
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Reproducing lizards modify sex allocation in response to operational sex ratios.

Authors:  Daniel A Warner; Richard Shine
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Don'T throw bateman out with the bathwater!

Authors:  Michael J Wade; Stephen M Shuster
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.326

7.  Ecology and evolution of plant mating.

Authors:  S C Barrett; L D Harder
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Variation in female life-history traits among Alaskan populations of the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. (Pisces: Gasterosteidae)

Authors: 
Journal:  Biol J Linn Soc Lond       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.138

Review 9.  Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems.

Authors:  S T Emlen; L W Oring
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Validation of Bateman's principles: a genetic study of sexual selection and mating patterns in the rough-skinned newt.

Authors:  Adam G Jones; J Roman Arguello; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  In the light of evolution III: two centuries of Darwin.

Authors:  John C Avise; Francisco J Ayala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Beyond promiscuity: mate-choice commitments in social breeding.

Authors:  Jacobus J Boomsma
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  How multiple mating by females affects sexual selection.

Authors:  Stephen M Shuster; William R Briggs; Patricia A Dennis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Extrapair mating and the strength of sexual selection: insights from a polymorphic species.

Authors:  Andrea S Grunst; Melissa L Grunst; Marisa L Korody; Lindsay M Forrette; Rusty A Gonser; Elaine M Tuttle
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 2.671

5.  Quantitative measures of sexual selection reveal no evidence for sex-role reversal in a sea spider with prolonged paternal care.

Authors:  Felipe S Barreto; John C Avise
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Equal fitness among alternative mating strategies in a harem polygynous insect.

Authors:  Sarah E Nason; Clint D Kelly
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  O father where art thou? Paternity analyses in a natural population of the haploid-diploid seaweed Chondrus crispus.

Authors:  S A Krueger-Hadfield; D Roze; J A Correa; C Destombe; M Valero
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  The evolution of monogamy is associated with reversals from male to female bias in the survival cost of parasitism.

Authors:  Tyler N Wittman; Robert M Cox
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Sexual selection in mushroom-forming basidiomycetes.

Authors:  Bart P S Nieuwenhuis; Alfons J M Debets; Duur K Aanen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Rapid adaptation to mammalian sociality via sexually selected traits.

Authors:  Adam C Nelson; Kevin E Colson; Steve Harmon; Wayne K Potts
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.