Literature DB >> 20643932

Polyandry increases offspring viability and mother productivity but does not decrease mother survival in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Patricia Adair Gowaty1, Yong-Kyu Kim, Jessica Rawlings, W W Anderson.   

Abstract

Polyandrous mating is common, but the benefits for females of polyandry remain controversial. To test whether mating with multiple males affects female fitness, we compared lifetime components of fitness of three experimental sets of Drosophila pseudoobscura females: monogamous females allowed to copulate one time (MOC); monogamous females held with a male over her entire life and experiencing many copulations (MMC); and polyandrous females with a different male over each day of their lives and also experiencing many copulations (PMC). Consistent with previous studies in this species, females in treatments in which multiple copulations occurred, MMC and PMC, had offspring with significantly higher egg-to-adult survival (i.e., offspring viability) and higher numbers of adult offspring (i.e., productivity) than MOC females, showing that multiple inseminations enhance offspring and mother fitness. In addition, although MMC females laid significantly more eggs than polyandrous (PMC) females, percent egg-to-adult survival and number of adult offspring were higher for PMC than MMC females, showing that polyandrous mating enhances the fitness of females more than multiply mating with only one male. Inconsistent with the cost of reproduction, lifespan was not significantly longer for MOC females than for MMC or PMC females. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine simultaneously in outbred WT Drosophila pseudoobscura the lifetime costs and benefits to females of polyandry, monogamy with a single copulation, and monogamy with repeat copulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20643932      PMCID: PMC2922267          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1006174107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  19 in total

Review 1.  Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits.

Authors:  M D Jennions; M Petrie
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2000-02

Review 2.  Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review.

Authors:  T Tregenza; N Wedell
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  The evolution of polyandry: patterns of genotypic variation in female mating frequency, male fertilization success and a test of the sexy-sperm hypothesis.

Authors:  L W Simmons
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Experimental constraints on mate preferences in Drosophila pseudoobscura decrease offspring viability and fitness of mated pairs.

Authors:  Wyatt W Anderson; Yong-Kyu Kim; Patricia Adair Gowaty
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A reappraisal of Bateman's classic study of intrasexual selection.

Authors:  Brian F Snyder; Patricia Adair Gowaty
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  The hypothesis of reproductive compensation and its assumptions about mate preferences and offspring viability.

Authors:  Patricia Adair Gowaty; Wyatt W Anderson; Cynthia K Bluhm; Lee C Drickamer; Yong-Kyu Kim; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Mutual interest between the sexes and reproductive success in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Patricia Adair Gowaty; Rebecca Steinichen; Wyatt W Anderson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Validation of Bateman's principles: a genetic study of sexual selection and mating patterns in the rough-skinned newt.

Authors:  Adam G Jones; J Roman Arguello; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Females increase offspring heterozygosity and fitness through extra-pair matings.

Authors:  Katharina Foerster; Kaspar Delhey; Arild Johnsen; Jan T Lifjeld; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Indiscriminate females and choosy males: within- and between-species variation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Patricia Adair Gowaty; Rebecca Steinichen; Wyatt W Anderson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  18 in total

1.  The influence of maternal effects on indirect benefits associated with polyandry.

Authors:  Clarissa M House; Bronwyn H Bleakley; Craig A Walling; Thomas A R Price; Clare E Stamper; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Convenience polyandry or convenience polygyny? Costly sex under female control in a promiscuous primate.

Authors:  Elise Huchard; Cindy I Canale; Chloé Le Gros; Martine Perret; Pierre-Yves Henry; Peter M Kappeler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Causes of lifetime fitness of Darwin's finches in a fluctuating environment.

Authors:  Peter R Grant; B Rosemary Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Micropyle number is associated with elevated female promiscuity in Lepidoptera.

Authors:  Graziella Iossa; Matthew J G Gage; Paul E Eady
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Fitness consequences of female multiple mating: a direct test of indirect benefits.

Authors:  Miguel Barbosa; Sean R Connolly; Mizue Hisano; Maria Dornelas; Anne E Magurran
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  "Cost" of virginity in wild Drosophila melanogaster females.

Authors:  Therese Ann Markow
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Multiple fitness benefits of polyandry in a cephalopod.

Authors:  Zoe E Squires; Bob B M Wong; Mark D Norman; Devi Stuart-Fox
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The evolution of multiple mating: Costs and benefits of polyandry to females and of polygyny to males.

Authors:  Patricia Adair Gowaty
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 2.160

9.  Polyandry in dragon lizards: inbred paternal genotypes sire fewer offspring.

Authors:  Celine H Frère; Dani Chandrasoma; Martin J Whiting
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Lifetime number of mates interacts with female age to determine reproductive success in female guppies.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.