Literature DB >> 16697435

Effects of interactions among wave aberrations on optical image quality.

J S McLellan1, P M Prieto, S Marcos, S A Burns.   

Abstract

Wave aberrations degrade the optical quality of the eye relative to the diffraction limit, but there are situations in which having slightly aberrated optics can provide some relative visual benefits. This fact led us to consider whether interactions among aberrations in the eye's wavefront produce an advantage for image quality relative to wavefronts with randomized combinations of aberrations with the same total RMS error. Total ocular wave aberrations from two experimental groups and corneal wave aberrations from one group were measured and expressed as Zernike polynomial expansions through the seventh-order. In a series of Monte Carlo simulations, modulation transfer functions (MTFs) for the measured wave aberrations were compared to distributions of artificial MTFs for wavefronts created by randomizing the sign or orientation of the aberrations, while maintaining the RMS error within each Zernike order. In a control condition, "synthetic" model eyes were produced by choosing each individual aberration term at random from individuals in the experimental group, and again MTFs were compared for original and randomized signs. Results were summarized by the MTF ratio: real MTF/mean simulated MTF, as a function of spatial frequency. For a 6mm pupil, the mean MTF ratio for total ocular aberrations was greater than 1.0 up to 60 cycles per degree, suggesting that the eye's aberrations are not independent and that there may be a positive functional consequences to their interrelations. This positive relation did not hold for corneal aberrations alone, or for the synthetic eyes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16697435      PMCID: PMC2790163          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  25 in total

1.  Age-related changes in monochromatic wave aberrations of the human eye.

Authors:  J S McLellan; S Marcos; S A Burns
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  Wavefront guided ablation.

Authors:  S M MacRae; D R Williams
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Imperfect optics may be the eye's defence against chromatic blur.

Authors:  James S McLellan; Susana Marcos; Pedro M Prieto; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-05-09       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A statistical model of the aberration structure of normal, well-corrected eyes.

Authors:  Larry N Thibos; Arthur Bradley; Xin Hong
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Contrast improvement of confocal retinal imaging by use of phase-correcting plates.

Authors:  Stephen A Burns; Susana Marcos; Ann E Elsner; Salvador Bara
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 3.776

6.  Measurement of the wave-front aberration of the eye by a fast psychophysical procedure.

Authors:  J C He; S Marcos; R H Webb; S A Burns
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Supernormal vision and high-resolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics.

Authors:  J Liang; D R Williams; D T Miller
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Optical response to LASIK surgery for myopia from total and corneal aberration measurements.

Authors:  S Marcos; S Barbero; L Llorente; J Merayo-Lloves
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 9.  Adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  A Roorda
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Monte Carlo simulation of irradiance distribution on the retina after refractive surgery.

Authors:  Vidal F Canales; Manuel P Cagigal
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  8 in total

1.  Three-dimensional relationship between high-order root-mean-square wavefront error, pupil diameter, and aging.

Authors:  Raymond A Applegate; William J Donnelly; Jason D Marsack; Darren E Koenig; Konrad Pesudovs
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Effect of sampling on real ocular aberration measurements.

Authors:  Lourdes Llorente; Susana Marcos; Carlos Dorronsoro; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Change in visual acuity is well correlated with change in image-quality metrics for both normal and keratoconic wavefront errors.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Jason D Marsack; Harold E Bedell; Yue Shi; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Chromatic and wavefront aberrations: L-, M- and S-cone stimulation with typical and extreme retinal image quality.

Authors:  Florent Autrusseau; Larry Thibos; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Change in visual acuity is highly correlated with change in six image quality metrics independent of wavefront error and/or pupil diameter.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Edwin J Sarver; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Improving wavefront boundary condition for in vivo high resolution adaptive optics ophthalmic imaging.

Authors:  Weiyao Zou; Xiaofeng Qi; Gang Huang; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Vision is protected against blue defocus.

Authors:  Clara Benedi-Garcia; Maria Vinas; Carlos Dorronsoro; Stephen A Burns; Eli Peli; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Comparison of the optical quality after SMILE and FS-LASIK for high myopia by OQAS and iTrace analyzer: a one-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Yewei Yin; Ying Lu; Aiqun Xiang; Yanyan Fu; Yang Zhao; Yuanjun Li; Tu Hu; Kaixuan Du; Shengfa Hu; Qiuman Fu; Xiaoying Wu; Dan Wen
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 2.209

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.