Literature DB >> 18259794

[Ultrasonic scissors. New vs resterilized instruments].

D Gärtner1, K Münz, E Hückelheim, U Hesse.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare reliability in handling and function of resterilized and single-use disposable ultrasonic scissors.
METHODS: In a prospective randomized study, the surgeon blindly tested new and resterilized ultrasonographic scissors. The parameters were force of activation, cutting effect, coagulation effect, error messages, and disturbing generator noise.
RESULTS: Fifty-one new and 49 resterilized instruments in 94 operations were evaluated. The differences in force of activation, cutting effect, and coagulation were not significant. Error messages and disturbing noises were rare in both groups. Six new instruments and two resterilized instruments had to be exchanged because of problems during surgery.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates comparable reliability in function and handling of resterilized and new ultrasonic scissors. The use of resterilized instruments leads to distinctly reduced costs and could contribute to efficiency in laparoscopic surgery.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18259794     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-007-1420-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  24 in total

1.  Ultrasonic energy in endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  S J Lee; K H Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.759

2.  [Use of the harmonic scalpel (Ultracision) in laparoscopic antireflux surgery].

Authors:  G Bischof; J Zacherl; M Imhof; R Jakesz; R Függer
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 0.942

3.  Materials helps repaint financials from red to black.

Authors:  K Sandrick
Journal:  Mater Manag Health Care       Date:  1993-08

4.  Ultrasonic versus standard electric dissection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mario Morino; Roberto Rimonda; Marco Ettore Allaix; Giuseppe Giraudo; Corrado Garrone
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Laparoscopic central pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Elena Orsenigo; Paolo Baccari; Guido Bissolotti; Carlo Staudacher
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Experience with ultrasound scissors and blades (UltraCision) in open and laparoscopic liver resection.

Authors:  Stefan Schmidbauer; Klaus K Hallfeldt; Günther Sitzmann; Thorsten Kantelhardt; Arnold Trupka
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus open vertical banded gastroplasty: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  F M H van Dielen; P B Soeters; L M de Brauw; J W M Greve
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Initial experience with the harmonic scalpel in liver surgery.

Authors:  P Gertsch; A Pelloni; A Guerra; A Krpo
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2000 May-Jun

9.  [Do costs decide? Disposable or reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy?].

Authors:  R Lefering; H Troidl; B M Ure
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Single center experience of laparoscopic vs. open resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach.

Authors:  V Pitsinis; A Z Khan; I Cranshaw; W H Allum
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2007-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.