Literature DB >> 9685533

Chemical composition of smoke produced by high-frequency electrosurgery in a closed gaseous environment. An in vitro study.

C Hensman1, D Baty, R G Willis, A Cuschieri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-frequency (HF) electrocoagulation and cutting procedures produce smoke by high-temperature pyrolysis of tissues. As distinct from the experience of conventional surgery, electrosurgical smoke is produced in a closed gaseous environment during laparoscopic operations. As a result, toxic chemicals may be absorbed into the circulation. The effects of this absorption are not known. Furthermore, the chemical composition of electrosurgical smoke produced in an anoxic environment may be different from that produced in air.
METHODS: Smoke was produced in vitro by HF electrocutting of fresh porcine liver in helium, CO2, and air-saturated closed environments. Smoke samples were collected and analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).
RESULTS: The chemical constituents of electrosurgical smoke produced in air, CO2, and helium were similar. To date, 21 chemicals, some highly toxic, have been identified in the electrosurgical smoke produced in a closed environment. These consist of hydrocarbons, nitriles, fatty acids, and phenols.
CONCLUSIONS: Electrosurgical smoke produced in a closed environment contains several toxic chemicals. The effects of these on cell viability, macrophage, and endothelial cell activation are not known but are being investigated. Meantime, measures to reduce smoke and evacuate it during endoscopic surgery are advisable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9685533     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  45 in total

1.  Feasibility of therapeutic pneumoperitoneum in a large animal model using a microvaporisator.

Authors:  M A Reymond; B Hu; A Garcia; T Reck; F Köckerling; J Hess; P Morel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The 'Tellytubby tummy'. A novel technique for laparostomy management.

Authors:  R J Guy; D Lloyd; H Min
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  How safe is high-power ultrasonic dissection?

Authors:  Tarek A Emam; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Evaluation of fine particles in surgical smoke from an urologist's operating room by time and by distance.

Authors:  Hong-Kai Wang; Fei Mo; Chun-Guang Ma; Bo Dai; Guo-Hai Shi; Yao Zhu; Hai-Liang Zhang; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Surgical Smoke Simulation Study: Physical Characterization and Respiratory Protection.

Authors:  Yousef Elmashae; Richard H Koehler; Michael Yermakov; Tiina Reponen; Sergey A Grinshpun
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 2.908

6.  Surgical smoke management for minimally invasive (micro)endoscopy: an experimental study.

Authors:  Dietmar Mattes; Edah Silajdzic; Monika Mayer; Martin Horn; Daniel Scheidbach; Werner Wackernagel; Gerald Langmann; Andreas Wedrich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Current attitudes and practices towards diathermy smoke.

Authors:  John Spearman; George Tsavellas; Paul Nichols
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Cost comparison of reusable and single-use ultrasonic shears for laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Elliot Yung; Michel Gagner; Alfons Pomp; Gregory Dakin; Luca Milone; Gladys Strain
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Biomedical electrosurgery devices containing nanostructure for minimally invasive surgery: reduction of thermal injury and acceleration of wound healing for liver cancer.

Authors:  Wen-Tien Hsiao; Li-Hsiang Lin; Hsi-Jen Chiang; Keng-Liang Ou; Han-Yi Cheng
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 10.  Health risks associated with exposure to surgical smoke for surgeons and operation room personnel.

Authors:  Kae Okoshi; Katsutoshi Kobayashi; Koichi Kinoshita; Yasuko Tomizawa; Suguru Hasegawa; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.