Literature DB >> 22033983

Can you McGurk yourself? Self-face and self-voice in audiovisual speech.

Christopher Aruffo1, David I Shore.   

Abstract

We are constantly exposed to our own face and voice, and we identify our own faces and voices as familiar. However, the influence of self-identity upon self-speech perception is still uncertain. Speech perception is a synthesis of both auditory and visual inputs; although we hear our own voice when we speak, we rarely see the dynamic movements of our own face. If visual speech and identity are processed independently, no processing advantage would obtain in viewing one's own highly familiar face. In the present experiment, the relative contributions of facial and vocal inputs to speech perception were evaluated with an audiovisual illusion. Our results indicate that auditory self-speech conveys a processing advantage, whereas visual self-speech does not. The data thereby support a model of visual speech as dynamic movement processed separately from speaker recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22033983     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0176-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  25 in total

1.  The use of facial motion and facial form during the processing of identity.

Authors:  Barbara Knappmeyer; Ian M Thornton; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech.

Authors:  Virginie van Wassenhove; Ken W Grant; David Poeppel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The self across the senses: an fMRI study of self-face and self-voice recognition.

Authors:  Jonas T Kaplan; Lisa Aziz-Zadeh; Lucina Q Uddin; Marco Iacoboni
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Investigations of hemispheric specialization of self-voice recognition.

Authors:  Christine Rosa; Maryse Lassonde; Claudine Pinard; Julian Paul Keenan; Pascal Belin
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Electrophysiological markers of voice familiarity.

Authors:  Maude Beauchemin; Louis De Beaumont; Phetsamone Vannasing; Aline Turcotte; Claudine Arcand; Pascal Belin; Maryse Lassonde
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Self-face recognition is characterized by "bilateral gain" and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted.

Authors:  Helen Keyes; Nuala Brady
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Talker-specific learning in speech perception.

Authors:  L C Nygaard; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-04

8.  Facial identity and facial speech processing: familiar faces and voices in the McGurk effect.

Authors:  S Walker; V Bruce; C O'Malley
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-11

9.  Face recognition and lipreading. A neurological dissociation.

Authors:  R Campbell; T Landis; M Regard
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Understanding face recognition.

Authors:  V Bruce; A Young
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1986-08
View more
  3 in total

1.  Electrophysiological evidence for a self-processing advantage during audiovisual speech integration.

Authors:  Avril Treille; Coriandre Vilain; Sonia Kandel; Marc Sato
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The self-advantage in visual speech processing enhances audiovisual speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Brent P Spehar; Joel Myerson; Sandra Hale; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

3.  Prediction and imitation in speech.

Authors:  Chiara Gambi; Martin J Pickering
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.