Literature DB >> 15697151

Effects of talker variability on perceptual learning of dialects.

Cynthia G Clopper1, David B Pisoni.   

Abstract

Two groups of listeners learned to categorize a set of unfamiliar talkers by dialect region using sentences selected from the TIMIT speech corpus. One group learned to categorize a single talker from each of six American English dialect regions. A second group learned to categorize three talkers from each dialect region. Following training, both groups were asked to categorize new talkers using the same categorization task. While the single-talker group was more accurate during initial training and test phases when familiar talkers produced the sentences, the three-talker group performed better on the generalization task with unfamiliar talkers. This cross-over effect in dialect categorization suggests that while talker variation during initial perceptual learning leads to more difficult learning of specific exemplars, exposure to intertalker variability facilitates robust perceptual learning and promotes better categorization performance of unfamiliar talkers. The results suggest that listeners encode and use acoustic-phonetic variability in speech to reliably perceive the dialect of unfamiliar talkers.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15697151      PMCID: PMC3434464          DOI: 10.1177/00238309040470030101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech        ISSN: 0023-8309            Impact factor:   1.500


  19 in total

1.  Learning to recognize talkers from natural, sinewave, and reversed speech samples.

Authors:  Sonya M Sheffert; David B Pisoni; Jennifer M Fellowes; Robert E Remez
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Speaker sex identification from voiced, whispered, and filtered isolated vowels.

Authors:  N J Lass; K R Hughes; M D Bowyer; L T Waters; V T Bourne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Identification and categorization in visual search.

Authors:  M J White
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-11

4.  Homebodies and army brats: Some effects of early linguistic experience and residential history on dialect categorization.

Authors:  Cynthia G Clopper; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Lang Var Change       Date:  2004-03-01

5.  Talker-specific learning in speech perception.

Authors:  L C Nygaard; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-04

6.  The encoding of rate and talker information during phonetic perception.

Authors:  K P Green; G R Tomiak; P K Kuhl
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-07

7.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production.

Authors:  A R Bradlow; D B Pisoni; R Akahane-Yamada; Y Tohkura
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Some considerations in evaluating spoken word recognition by normal-hearing, noise-masked normal-hearing, and cochlear implant listeners. I: The effects of response format.

Authors:  M S Sommers; K I Kirk; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  J W Mullennix; D B Pisoni; C S Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; T J Palmeri; S C McKinley
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  27 in total

1.  Talker familiarity and spoken word recognition in school-age children.

Authors:  Susannah V Levi
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2014-08-27

2.  Training to use voice onset time as a cue to talker identification induces a left-ear/right-hemisphere processing advantage.

Authors:  Alexander L Francis; Courtney Driscoll
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech.

Authors:  Ann R Bradlow; Tessa Bent
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-05-29

Review 4.  Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning.

Authors:  Merav Ahissar; Mor Nahum; Israel Nelken; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design.

Authors:  Tyler K Perrachione; Jiyeon Lee; Louisa Y Y Ha; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Syllables in Sync Form a Link: Neural Phase-locking Reflects Word Knowledge during Language Learning.

Authors:  Laura Batterink
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Lexically guided phonetic retuning of foreign-accented speech and its generalization.

Authors:  Eva Reinisch; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Another bilingual advantage? Perception of talker-voice information.

Authors:  Susannahv Levi
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2017-06-09

Review 9.  Exercising your brain: a review of human brain plasticity and training-induced learning.

Authors:  C S Green; D Bavelier
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2008-12

10.  Auditory free classification of nonnative speech.

Authors:  Eriko Atagi; Tessa Bent
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2013-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.