Intraindividual comparison of gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadobenate dimeglumine, and gadobutrol for pelvic 3D magnetic resonance angiography.

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect on image quality of a 1.0 mol/L gadolinium chelate with that of two 0.5 mol/L gadolinium compounds.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five healthy volunteers underwent a mono-station 3D MRA exam (Siemens SONATA, Erlangen, Germany) four times using four separate gadolinium preparations. All subjects first received a fixed volume of undiluted gadobutrol (1 mol/L), which corresponded to a dose between 0.1 and 0.15 mmol/kg body weight. This gadobutrol dosage was then diluted with saline into twice the volume and administered as a bolus at twice the injection rate. For Gd-DTPA and Gd BOPTA, because these contrast agents are 0.5 mol/L preparations, the volume and flow rate were doubled to match diluted gadobutrol volume and concentration. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the angiographic data sets was performed on nine arterial segments.
RESULTS: Image quality was rated diagnostic for all image data sets without statistically significant differences between any of the compounds (P > 0.3). Quantitative measurements of Gd BOPTA (SNR: 81.15; CNR: 68.91) and both standard and diluted forms of gadobutrol (SNR: 84.33; CNR: 71.62; SNR(diluted): 79,23; CNR(diluted): 66.26) yielded significantly higher results (P < 0.02) in comparison with Gd-DTPA (SNR: 49.55; CNR: 38.24). The difference between either form of gadobutrol and Gd BOPTA was not shown to be statistically significant (P > 0.3), whereas both the SNR and CNR of standard gadobutrol were significantly higher than diluted gadobutrol.
CONCLUSION: Gadobutrol- and Gd BOPTA-MRA exams lead to improved delineation of the pelvic arterial morphology compared with MRA exams performed with Gd-DTPA.