OBJECTIVE: To compare the image quality of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of the supra-aortic vessels at 0.05 mmol/kg bw and 0.1 mmol/kg bw, between gadobutrol, Gd-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA quantitatively and qualitatively a total of eight pigs were evaluated intraindividually at 1.5 T. METHODS: Each pig was examined using 0.1 mmol/kg gadobutrol, Gd-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA on day one and 0.05 mmol/kg on day two. MRA datasets for the carotid artery and the infraorbital artery were qualitatively assessed regarding overall image quality on an ordinal four-point scale (4-excellent, 1-non-diagnostic). The signal-to noise-ratio (SNR) was measured. RESULTS: The qualitative assessment of the carotid artery showed a higher median image quality for the 0.1 mmol dose than for the 0.05 mmol dose for all three compounds. No difference was found for the infraorbital artery. Mean SNR of Gd-BOPTA, Gd-DTPA, gadobutrol at 0.05 mmol/kg were 36.0 ± 13.4/37.9 ± 16.3/43.7 ± 0.4 and at 0.1 mmol/kg they were 50.1 ± 12.4/46.6 ± 6.5 / 54.6 ± 10.2. Gd-BOPTA 0.05 revealed a significantly lower SNR than all other agents at normal dose. CONCLUSIONS: Full-dose gadolinium MRA results in higher image quality and significantly higher SNR compared with the half dose. Gadobutrol and Gd-BOPTA have similar enhancement properties at full dose but at half dose, gadobutrol appears superior.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the image quality of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of the supra-aortic vessels at 0.05 mmol/kg bw and 0.1 mmol/kg bw, between gadobutrol, Gd-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA quantitatively and qualitatively a total of eight pigs were evaluated intraindividually at 1.5 T. METHODS: Each pig was examined using 0.1 mmol/kg gadobutrol, Gd-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA on day one and 0.05 mmol/kg on day two. MRA datasets for the carotid artery and the infraorbital artery were qualitatively assessed regarding overall image quality on an ordinal four-point scale (4-excellent, 1-non-diagnostic). The signal-to noise-ratio (SNR) was measured. RESULTS: The qualitative assessment of the carotid artery showed a higher median image quality for the 0.1 mmol dose than for the 0.05 mmol dose for all three compounds. No difference was found for the infraorbital artery. Mean SNR of Gd-BOPTA, Gd-DTPA, gadobutrol at 0.05 mmol/kg were 36.0 ± 13.4/37.9 ± 16.3/43.7 ± 0.4 and at 0.1 mmol/kg they were 50.1 ± 12.4/46.6 ± 6.5 / 54.6 ± 10.2. Gd-BOPTA 0.05 revealed a significantly lower SNR than all other agents at normal dose. CONCLUSIONS: Full-dose gadolinium MRA results in higher image quality and significantly higher SNR compared with the half dose. Gadobutrol and Gd-BOPTA have similar enhancement properties at full dose but at half dose, gadobutrol appears superior.
Authors: Bernd Tombach; Thomas Benner; Peter Reimer; Gerhard Schuierer; Eva-Maria Fallenberg; Viviane Geens; Thomas Wels; A Gregory Sorensen Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-01-31 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Martin Rohrer; Hans Bauer; Jan Mintorovitch; Martin Requardt; Hanns-Joachim Weinmann Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Mathias Goyen; Christoph U Herborn; Florian M Vogt; Knut Kröger; Rüdiger Verhagen; Fan Yang; Silke Bosk; Jörg F Debatin; Stefan G Ruehm Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Christoph U Herborn; Thomas C Lauenstein; Stefan G Ruehm; Silke Bosk; Jörg F Debatin; Mathias Goyen Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Matthias Voth; Stefan Haneder; Kurt Huck; Alexandra Gutfleisch; Stefan O Schönberg; Henrik J Michaely Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Christian Fink; Michael Bock; Fabian Kiessling; Matthias Philipp Lichy; Radko Krissak; Ivan Zuna; Astrid Schmähl; Stefan Delorme; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Martin R Prince; Honglei Zhang; Michael Morris; Jennifer L MacGregor; Marc E Grossman; Jeffrey Silberzweig; Robert L DeLapaz; Henry J Lee; Cynthia M Magro; Anthony M Valeri Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Stefan Haneder; Ulrike I Attenberger; Philipp Riffel; Thomas Henzler; Stefan O Schoenberg; Henrik J Michaely Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-01-28 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Ulrike I Attenberger; John N Morelli; Stefan O Schoenberg; Henrik J Michaely Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2011-11-15 Impact factor: 5.364