Literature DB >> 18278504

Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic-resonance angiography of the renal arteries: interindividual comparison of 0.2 mmol/kg gadobutrol at 1.5 T and 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine at 3.0 T.

Ulrike I Attenberger1, Henrik J Michaely, Bernd J Wintersperger, Steven P Sourbron, Klaus-Peter Lodemann, Maximilian F Reiser, Stefan O Schoenberg.   

Abstract

The purpose was to evaluate the image quality of high-spatial resolution MRA of the renal arteries at 1.5 T after contrast-agent injection of 0.2 mmol/kg body weight (BW) in an interindividual comparison to 3.0 T after contrast-agent injection of 0.1 mmol/kg BW contrast agent (CA). After IRB approval and informed consent, 40 consecutive patients (25 men, 15 women; mean age 53.9 years) underwent MRA of the renal arteries either at a 1.5-T MR system with 0.2 mmol/kg BW gadobutrol or at a 3.0-T MR scanner with 0.1 mmol/kg BW gadobenate dimeglumine used as CA in a randomized order. A constant volume of 15 ml of these contrast agents was applied. The spatial resolution of the MRA sequences was 1.0 x 0.8 x 1.0 mm(3) at 1.5 T and 0.9 x 0.8 x 0.9 mm(3) at 3.0 T, which was achieved by using parallel imaging acceleration factors of 2 at 1.5 T and 3 at 3.0 T, respectively. Two radiologists blinded to the administered CA and the field strength assessed the image quality and the venous overlay for the aorta, the proximal and distal renal arteries independently on a four-point Likert-type scale. Phantom measurements were performed for a standardized comparison of SNR at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the image quality at 3.0 T with 0.1 mmol/kg BW gadobenate dimeglumine compared to the exams at 1.5 T with 0.2 mmol/kg BW gadobutrol. The median scores were between 3 and 4 (good to excellent vessel visualization) for the aorta (3 at 1.5 T/4 at 3.0 T for reader 1 and 2). For the proximal renal arteries, median scores were 3 for the left and right renal artery at 1.5 T for both readers. At 3.0 T, median scores were 3 (left proximal renal artery) and 4 (right proximal renal artery) for reader 1 and 3 (left/right) for reader 2 at 3.0 T. For the distal renal arteries, median scores were between 2 and 3 at both field strengths (moderate and good) for both readers. The kappa values for both field strengths were comparable and ranged between 0.571 (moderate) for the distal renal arteries and 0.905 (almost perfect) for the proximal renal arteries. In the phantom measurements, a 40% higher SNR was found for the measurements at 3 T with gadobenate dimeglumine. High-spatial resolution renal MRA at 3.0 T with 0.1 mmol/kg BW gadobenate dimeglumine yields at least equal image quality compared with renal MRA at 1.5 T with 0.2 mmol/kg BW gadobutrol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18278504     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-0873-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  34 in total

1.  Do highly concentrated gadolinium chelates improve MR brain perfusion imaging? Intraindividually controlled randomized crossover concentration comparison study of 0.5 versus 1.0 mol/L gadobutrol.

Authors:  Bernd Tombach; Thomas Benner; Peter Reimer; Gerhard Schuierer; Eva-Maria Fallenberg; Viviane Geens; Thomas Wels; A Gregory Sorensen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-01-31       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging: safety update.

Authors:  Miles A Kirchin; Val M Runge
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-10

3.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA).

Authors:  Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Gadolinium--a specific trigger for the development of nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis?

Authors:  Thomas Grobner
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 5.992

5.  Optimization of contrast timing for breath-hold three-dimensional MR angiography.

Authors:  T F Hany; G C McKinnon; D A Leung; T Pfammatter; J F Debatin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Gadodiamide-associated nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: why radiologists should be concerned.

Authors:  Dale R Broome; Mark S Girguis; Pedro W Baron; Alfred C Cottrell; Ingrid Kjellin; Gerald A Kirk
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  European Society of Urogenital Radiology guidelines on contrast media application.

Authors:  Henrik S Thomsen
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 8.  Value of 1.0- M gadolinium chelates: review of preclinical and clinical data on gadobutrol.

Authors:  Bernd Tombach; Walter Heindel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-02-21       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Intraindividual comparison of gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadobenate dimeglumine, and gadobutrol for pelvic 3D magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Christoph U Herborn; Thomas C Lauenstein; Stefan G Ruehm; Silke Bosk; Jörg F Debatin; Mathias Goyen
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 10.  Gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance) for magnetic resonance angiography: review of the literature.

Authors:  M Goyen; J F Debatin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.034

View more
  6 in total

1.  Three-tesla MRI biphasic angiography: a method for preoperative assessment of the vascular supply in renal tumours: a surgical perspective.

Authors:  Milan Hora; Petr Stránský; Ivan Trávníček; Tomáš Urge; Viktor Eret; Boris Kreuzberg; Jan Baxa; Hynek Mírka; Fredrik Petersson; Ondřej Hes; Jiří Ferda
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  [MRI for therapy control in patients with aortic isthmus stenosis].

Authors:  B J Wintersperger; D Theisen; M F Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Assessment of the kidneys: magnetic resonance angiography, perfusion and diffusion.

Authors:  Ulrike I Attenberger; John N Morelli; Stefan O Schoenberg; Henrik J Michaely
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance angiography: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Michael P Hartung; Thomas M Grist; Christopher J François
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.364

5.  64-Slice CT angiography of the abdominal aorta and abdominal arteries: comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of iobitridol 350 mgI/ml versus iomeprol 400 mgI/ml in a prospective, randomised, double-blind multi-centre trial.

Authors:  Christian Loewe; Christoph R Becker; Riccardo Berletti; Carlo Alberto Cametti; Jerome Caudron; Walter Coudyzer; Johan De Mey; Massimo Favat; Jean-François Heautot; Sam Heye; Markus Hittinger; Antoine Larralde; Jean-Pierre Lestrat; Roberto Marangoni; Koenraad Nieboer; Peter Reimer; Martin Schwarz; Melanie Schernthaner; Johannes Lammer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Gadobutrol versus gadofosveset-trisodium in MR venography of the lower extremities.

Authors:  Carsten W K P Arnoldussen; Yeelai Lam; Nobutake Ito; Bjorn Winkens; M Eline Kooi; Cees H A Wittens; Joachim E Wildberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 5.315

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.