Literature DB >> 18607594

Comparison of 1.0 M gadobutrol and 0.5 M gadopentate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI in 471 patients with known or suspected renal lesions: results of a multicenter, single-blind, interindividual, randomized clinical phase III trial.

Bernd Tombach1, Klaus Bohndorf, Wolfgang Brodtrager, Claus D Claussen, Christoph Düber, Michael Galanski, Eckhardt Grabbe, Giacomo Gortenuti, Michael Kuhn, Walter Gross-Fengels, Renate Hammerstingl, Brigitte Happel, Gertraud Heinz-Peer, Gregor Jung, Thomas Kittner, Roberto Lagalla, Philipp Lengsfeld, Reinhard Loose, Raymond H G Oyen, Pietro Pavlica, Christiane Pering, Roberto Pozzi-Mucelli, Thorsten Persigehl, Peter Reimer, Nomdo S Renken, Götz M Richter, Ernst J Rummeny, Fritz Schäfer, Malgorzata Szczerbo-Trojanowska, Andrzej Urbanik, Thomas J Vogl, Paul Hajek.   

Abstract

The purpose of this phase III clinical trial was to compare two different extracellular contrast agents, 1.0 M gadobutrol and 0.5 M gadopentate dimeglumine, for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with known or suspected focal renal lesions. Using a multicenter, single-blind, interindividual, randomized study design, both contrast agents were compared in a total of 471 patients regarding their diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity to correctly classify focal lesions of the kidney. To test for noninferiority the diagnostic accuracy rates for both contrast agents were compared with CT results based on a blinded reading. The average diagnostic accuracy across the three blinded readers ('average reader') was 83.7% for gadobutrol and 87.3% for gadopentate dimeglumine. The increase in accuracy from precontrast to combined precontrast and postcontrast MRI was 8.0% for gadobutrol and 6.9% for gadopentate dimeglumine. Sensitivity of the average reader was 85.2% for gadobutrol and 88.7% for gadopentate dimeglumine. Specificity of the average reader was 82.1% for gadobutrol and 86.1% for gadopentate dimeglumine. In conclusion, this study documents evidence for the noninferiority of a single i.v. bolus injection of 1.0 M gadobutrol compared with 0.5 M gadopentate dimeglumine in the diagnostic assessment of renal lesions with CE-MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18607594     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1054-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  30 in total

1.  [Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the arterial and portovenous system of the liver with varying concentrations of contrast medium].

Authors:  R Vosshenrich; B Engeroff; S Obenauer; E Grabbe
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2003-09

2.  Whole-body CE-MRA with Gadovist.

Authors:  Bernd Tombach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Gadolinium--a specific trigger for the development of nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis?

Authors:  Thomas Grobner
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 5.992

4.  Assessment of utilization and pharmacovigilance based on spontaneous adverse event reporting of gadopentetate dimeglumine as a magnetic resonance contrast agent after 45 million administrations and 15 years of clinical use.

Authors:  Michael V Knopp; Thomas Balzer; Marc Esser; Franciska K Kashanian; Predip Paul; Hans P Niendorf
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Pharmacokinetics, dose proportionality, and tolerability of gadobutrol after single intravenous injection in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  T Staks; G Schuhmann-Giampieri; T Frenzel; H J Weinmann; L Lange; J Platzek
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Using a 1 M Gd-chelate (gadobutrol) for total-body three-dimensional MR angiography: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Mathias Goyen; Christoph U Herborn; Florian M Vogt; Knut Kröger; Rüdiger Verhagen; Fan Yang; Silke Bosk; Jörg F Debatin; Stefan G Ruehm
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Intraindividual comparison of gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadobenate dimeglumine, and gadobutrol for pelvic 3D magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Christoph U Herborn; Thomas C Lauenstein; Stefan G Ruehm; Silke Bosk; Jörg F Debatin; Mathias Goyen
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Gadobutrol-enhanced moving-table magnetic resonance angiography in patients with peripheral vascular disease: a prospective, multi-centre blinded comparison with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Annette Hentsch; Manuela A Aschauer; Jörn O Balzer; Joachim Brossmann; Hans P Busch; Kirsten Davis; Philippe Douek; Franz Ebner; Jos M A van Engelshoven; Michaela Gregor; Christian Kersting; Patrick R Knüsel; Edward Leen; Tim Leiner; Christian Loewe; Simon McPherson; Peter Reimer; Fritz K W Schäfer; Matthias Taupitz; Siegfried A Thurnher; Bernd Tombach; Robin Wegener; Dominik Weishaupt; James F M Meaney
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-03-25       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a population study examining the relationship of disease development to gadolinium exposure.

Authors:  Aneet Deo; Mitchell Fogel; Shawn E Cowper
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a serious iatrogenic disease of renal failure patients.

Authors:  Misbah Khurram; Lone Skov; Kristian Rossen; Henrik S Thomsen; Peter Marckmann
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Gadobutrol: a review of its use for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in adults and children.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  Intra-individual, randomised comparison of the MRI contrast agents gadobutrol and gadoterate in imaging the distal lower limb of patients with known or suspected osteomyelitis, evaluated in an off-site blinded read.

Authors:  Werner Pennekamp; Daniela Roggenland; Steffen Hering; Stefan Lemburg; Soeren Peters; Sabrina Sterl; Carsten Schwenke; Volkmar Nicolas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  High-relaxivity contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance neuroimaging: a review.

Authors:  Frederik L Giesel; Amit Mehndiratta; Marco Essig
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Intra-individual, randomised comparison of the MRI contrast agents gadobutrol versus gadoteridol in patients with primary and secondary brain tumours, evaluated in a blinded read.

Authors:  M Koenig; G Schulte-Altedorneburg; M Piontek; A Hentsch; P Spangenberg; C Schwenke; A Harders; L Heuser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Evaluation of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) using Gd-DOTA compared with time-of-flight MRA in the diagnosis of clinically significant non-coronary arterial disease.

Authors:  Joon-Won Kang; Tae-Hwan Lim; Choong-Gon Choi; Gi-Young Ko; Jeong-Kon Kim; Tae-Won Kwon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Safety and efficacy of gadobutrol-enhanced MRI in patients aged under 2 years-a single-center, observational study.

Authors:  Ravi Bhargava; Michelle Noga
Journal:  Magn Reson Insights       Date:  2013-02-06

Review 7.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients: review and recommendations for current practice.

Authors:  Ravi Bhargava; Gabriele Hahn; Wolfgang Hirsch; Myung-Joon Kim; Hans-Joachim Mentzel; Oystein E Olsen; Eira Stokland; Fabio Triulzi; Elida Vazquez
Journal:  Magn Reson Insights       Date:  2013-10-20

Review 8.  Gadobutrol in India-A Comprehensive Review of Safety and Efficacy.

Authors:  Jan Endrikat; Nicoletta Anzalone
Journal:  Magn Reson Insights       Date:  2017-09-11

Review 9.  Gadobutrol: A Review in Contrast-Enhanced MRI and MRA.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.859

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.