Literature DB >> 12417458

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of human area MT/V5 disrupts perception and storage of the motion aftereffect.

Hugo Théoret1, Masahito Kobayashi, Giorgio Ganis, Paul Di Capua, Alvaro Pascual-Leone.   

Abstract

Following adaptation to a moving stimulus, the introduction of a stationary pattern creates the illusion of motion. This phenomenon, known as the motion aftereffect (MAE), can be delayed by placing a blank storage interval between the adapting and test stimuli. Human motion selective area MT/V5 has been proposed as the likely neural origin of MAEs. To examine the role of MT/V5 in perceiving and storing MAEs, we applied repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to this area during a 10s storage interval and while subjects perceived illusory motion. Our results show that rTMS disrupts perception of the MAE when it is delivered in the early parts of the storage period and when it is applied during the perceptual MAE itself. Stimulation of control regions corresponding to V1 or Cz did not affect the MAE. In addition, magnetic stimulation of dorsolateral prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices did not disrupt MAE perception. These data provide experimental support for the notion that MT/V5 subserves perception and storage of the motion aftereffect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12417458     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00112-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  16 in total

1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation over MT/MST fails to impair judgments of implied motion.

Authors:  James L Alford; Paul van Donkelaar; Paul Dassonville; Richard T Marrocco
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Duje Tadin; Kenith V Sobel; Tony A Raissian; Sang Chul Chong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The initial interactions underlying binocular rivalry require visual awareness.

Authors:  Sarah Hancock; David Whitney; Timothy J Andrews
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Visually guided reaching depends on motion area MT+.

Authors:  David Whitney; Amanda Ellison; Nichola J Rice; Derek Arnold; Melvyn Goodale; Vincent Walsh; David Milner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Causal evidence for a privileged working memory state in early visual cortex.

Authors:  Nahid Zokaei; Sanjay Manohar; Masud Husain; Eva Feredoes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The postcentral gyrus shows sustained fMRI activation during the tactile motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Peggy J Planetta; Philip Servos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Extra-retinal adaptation of cortical motion-processing areas during pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Tom C A Freeman; Jane H Sumnall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  The motion aftereffect reloaded.

Authors:  George Mather; Andrea Pavan; Gianluca Campana; Clara Casco
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 9.  Seeing the invisible: the scope and limits of unconscious processing in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Zhicheng Lin; Sheng He
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 10.  State-dependency of transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Juha Silvanto; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.