Literature DB >> 24381277

Causal evidence for a privileged working memory state in early visual cortex.

Nahid Zokaei1, Sanjay Manohar, Masud Husain, Eva Feredoes.   

Abstract

Emerging evidence suggests that items held in working memory (WM) might not all be in the same representational state. One item might be privileged over others, making it more accessible and thereby recalled with greater precision. Here, using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we provide causal evidence in human participants that items in WM are differentially susceptible to disruptive TMS, depending on their state, determined either by task relevance or serial position. Across two experiments, we applied TMS to area MT+ during the WM retention of two motion directions. In Experiment 1, we used an "incidental cue" to bring one of the two targets into a privileged state. In Experiment 2, we presented the targets sequentially so that the last item was in a privileged state by virtue of recency. In both experiments, recall precision of motion direction was differentially affected by TMS, depending on the state of the memory target at the time of disruption. Privileged items were recalled with less precision, whereas nonprivileged items were recalled with higher precision. Thus, only the privileged item was susceptible to disruptive TMS over MT+. By contrast, precision of the nonprivileged item improved either directly because of facilitation by TMS or indirectly through reduced interference from the privileged item. Our results provide a unique line of evidence, as revealed by TMS over a posterior sensory brain region, for at least two different states of item representation in WM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24381277      PMCID: PMC3866482          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2899-13.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  45 in total

Review 1.  Neurocomputational models of working memory.

Authors:  D Durstewitz; J K Seamans; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  A new anatomical landmark for reliable identification of human area V5/MT: a quantitative analysis of sulcal patterning.

Authors:  S O Dumoulin; R G Bittar; N J Kabani; C L Baker; G Le Goualher; G Bruce Pike; A C Evans
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.

Authors:  Ivan C Griffin; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Retinotopy and functional subdivision of human areas MT and MST.

Authors:  Alexander C Huk; Robert F Dougherty; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Cellular basis of working memory.

Authors:  P S Goldman-Rakic
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of human area MT/V5 disrupts perception and storage of the motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Hugo Théoret; Masahito Kobayashi; Giorgio Ganis; Paul Di Capua; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Simple models for reading neuronal population codes.

Authors:  H S Seung; H Sompolinsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Neuron activity related to short-term memory.

Authors:  J M Fuster; G E Alexander
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-08-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The multiple roles of visual cortical areas MT/MST in remembering the direction of visual motion.

Authors:  J W Bisley; T Pasternak
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Rapid forgetting prevented by retrospective attention cues.

Authors:  Yoni Pertzov; Paul M Bays; Sabine Joseph; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  28 in total

1.  The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations.

Authors:  Eren Gunseli; Dirk van Moorselaar; Martijn Meeter; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

2.  The Neural Consequences of Attentional Prioritization of Internal Representations in Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  Muhammet I Sahan; Andrew D Sheldon; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Lateralized delay period activity marks the focus of spatial attention in working memory: evidence from somatosensory event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Tobias Katus; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The short- and long-term fates of memory items retained outside the focus of attention.

Authors:  Joshua J LaRocque; Adam S Eichenbaum; Michael J Starrett; Nathan S Rose; Stephen M Emrich; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-04

Review 5.  State-dependent effects of neural stimulation on brain function and cognition.

Authors:  Claire Bradley; Abbey S Nydam; Paul E Dux; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 38.755

6.  Working memory prioritization impacts neural recovery from distraction.

Authors:  Remington Mallett; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Disrupting Short-Term Memory Maintenance in Premotor Cortex Affects Serial Dependence in Visuomotor Integration.

Authors:  Raymundo Machado de Azevedo Neto; Andreas Bartels
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Supraliminal but not subliminal distracters bias working memory recall.

Authors:  Theresa Wildegger; Nicholas E Myers; Glyn Humphreys; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Prioritized verbal working memory content biases ongoing action.

Authors:  Jacob A Miller; Anastasia Kiyonaga; Richard B Ivry; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Temporal dynamics of attention during encoding versus maintenance of working memory: complementary views from event-related potentials and alpha-band oscillations.

Authors:  Nicholas E Myers; Lena Walther; George Wallis; Mark G Stokes; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.