Literature DB >> 18318606

The initial interactions underlying binocular rivalry require visual awareness.

Sarah Hancock1, David Whitney, Timothy J Andrews.   

Abstract

Current theories of binocular vision suggest that the neural processes that resolve interocular conflict do not involve a single brain region but occur at multiple stages of visual processing. Here, using an adaptation paradigm, we explore the initial mechanisms involved in selecting a stimulus for perceptual dominance during binocular rivalry. When one or both eyes briefly viewed an adapting grating stimulus prior to the presentation of the adapting grating to one eye and an orthogonal, non-adapted grating to the other eye, participants more often reported perceptual dominance of the non-adapted grating. Crowding reduced awareness of the adapting grating. On trials in which subjects were unaware of the orientation of the adaptor grating, there was no effect of the adaptor on perceived dominance during rivalry; participants were just as likely to report dominance of the adapted or non-adapted grating. This implies that the initial events in binocular rivalry involve later stages of visual processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18318606      PMCID: PMC2696403          DOI: 10.1167/8.1.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  41 in total

1.  Adaptation-induced plasticity of orientation tuning in adult visual cortex.

Authors:  V Dragoi; J Sharma; M Sur
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision.

Authors:  L Parkes; J Lund; A Angelucci; J A Solomon; M Morgan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Competing global representations fail to initiate binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Thomas A Carlson; Sheng He
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Fusion and rivalry are dependent on the perceptual meaning of visual stimuli.

Authors:  Timothy J Andrews; R Beau Lotto
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Face adaptation depends on seeing the face.

Authors:  Farshad Moradi; Christof Koch; Shinsuke Shimojo
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-01-06       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex.

Authors:  F Tong; K Nakayama; J T Vaughan; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization.

Authors:  D L Sheinberg; N K Logothetis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Adaptation to invisible gratings and the site of binocular rivalry suppression.

Authors:  R Blake; R Fox
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-05-31       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images.

Authors:  C Blakemore; F W Campbell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Independent binocular integration for form and colour.

Authors:  David J Holmes; Sarah Hancock; Timothy J Andrews
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  3 in total

1.  BINOCULAR RIVALRY AND NEURAL DYNAMICS.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Sang-Hun Lee; David Heeger
Journal:  Psichologija (Vilniaus Univ)       Date:  2008-06-01

2.  The effects of categorical and linguistic adaptation on binocular rivalry initial dominance.

Authors:  Vassilis Pelekanos; Daphne Roumani; Konstantinos Moutoussis
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Serial dependence in visual perception.

Authors:  Jason Fischer; David Whitney
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 24.884

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.