Literature DB >> 18951829

The motion aftereffect reloaded.

George Mather1, Andrea Pavan, Gianluca Campana, Clara Casco.   

Abstract

The motion aftereffect is a robust illusion of visual motion resulting from exposure to a moving pattern. There is a widely accepted explanation of it in terms of changes in the response of cortical direction-selective neurons. Research has distinguished several variants of the effect. Converging recent evidence from different experimental techniques (psychophysics, single-unit recording, brain imaging, transcranial magnetic stimulation, visual evoked potentials and magnetoencephalography) reveals that adaptation is not confined to one or even two cortical areas, but occurs at multiple levels of processing involved in visual motion analysis. A tentative motion-processing framework is described, based on motion aftereffect research. Recent ideas on the function of adaptation see it as a form of gain control that maximises the efficiency of information transmission at multiple levels of the visual pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18951829      PMCID: PMC3087115          DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  48 in total

1.  The motion aftereffect: more than area V5/MT? Evidence from 15O-butanol PET studies.

Authors:  H Hautzel; J G Taylor; B J Krause; N Schmitz; L Tellmann; K Ziemons; N J Shah; H Herzog; H W Müller-Gärtner
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Topography of evoked potentials associated with illusory motion perception as a motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Yuji Kobayashi; Aihide Yoshino; Tsuneyuki Ogasawara; Soichiro Nomura
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-02

3.  Neuronal adaptation to visual motion in area MT of the macaque.

Authors:  Adam Kohn; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Selective sensitivity to direction of movement in ganglion cells of the rabbit retina.

Authors:  H B BARLOW; R M HILL
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-02-01       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Tuning properties of radial phantom motion aftereffects.

Authors:  Nicholas S C Price; John A Greenwood; Michael R Ibbotson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The motion aftereffect of transparent motion: two temporal channels account for perceived direction.

Authors:  David Alais; Frans A J Verstraten; David C Burr
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Directional motion sensitivity under transparent motion conditions.

Authors:  F A Verstraten; R E Fredericksen; R J van Wezel; J C Boulton; W A van de Grind
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Temporal and spatial frequency tuning of the flicker motion aftereffect.

Authors:  P J Bex; F A Verstraten; I Mareschal
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  After-effects and the integration of patterns of neural activity within a channel.

Authors:  B Moulden
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1980-07-08       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Phantom motion after effects--evidence of detectors for the analysis of optic flow.

Authors:  R J Snowden; A B Milne
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  42 in total

1.  Attention alters feature space in motion processing.

Authors:  Marc Zirnsak; Fred H Hamker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  One's motor performance predictably modulates the understanding of others' actions through adaptation of premotor visuo-motor neurons.

Authors:  Luigi Cattaneo; Guido Barchiesi; Davide Tabarelli; Carola Arfeller; Marc Sato; Arthur M Glenberg
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Individual differences in visual motion perception and neurotransmitter concentrations in the human brain.

Authors:  Tatsuto Takeuchi; Sanae Yoshimoto; Yasuhiro Shimada; Takanori Kochiyama; Hirohito M Kondo
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Human yaw rotation aftereffects with brief duration rotations are inconsistent with velocity storage.

Authors:  Andrew J Coniglio; Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-10

5.  A visual distracter task during adaptation reduces the proprioceptive movement aftereffect.

Authors:  Tatjana Seizova-Cajic; Rita Azzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Different time scales of motion integration for anticipatory smooth pursuit and perceptual adaptation.

Authors:  Gerrit W Maus; Elena Potapchuk; Scott N J Watamaniuk; Stephen J Heinen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Modulating adaptation to emotional faces by spatial frequency filtering.

Authors:  Giulia Prete; Bruno Laeng; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-11-26

8.  Limited interaction between translation and visual motion aftereffects in humans.

Authors:  Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Visual stability and the motion aftereffect: a psychophysical study revealing spatial updating.

Authors:  Ulrich Biber; Uwe J Ilg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dynamics of spatial distortions reveal multiple time scales of motion adaptation.

Authors:  Neil W Roach; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.