Literature DB >> 16191625

Extra-retinal adaptation of cortical motion-processing areas during pursuit eye movements.

Tom C A Freeman1, Jane H Sumnall.   

Abstract

Repetitive eye movement produces a compelling motion aftereffect (MAE). One mechanism thought to contribute to the illusory movement is an extra-retinal motion signal generated after adaptation. However, extra-retinal signals are also generated during pursuit. They modulate activity within cortical motion-processing area MST, helping transform retinal motion into motion in the world during an eye movement. Given the evidence that MST plays a key role in generating MAE, it may also become indirectly adapted by prolonged pursuit. To differentiate between these two extra-retinal mechanisms we examined storage of the MAE across a period of darkness. In one condition observers were told to stare at a moving pattern, an instruction that induces a more reflexive type of eye movement. In another they were told to deliberately pursue it. We found equally long MAEs when testing immediately after adaptation but not when the test was delayed by 40 s. In the case of the reflexive eye movement the delay almost completely extinguished the MAE, whereas the illusory motion following pursuit remained intact. This suggests pursuit adapts cortical motion-processing areas whereas unintentional eye movement does not. A second experiment showed that cortical mechanisms cannot be the sole determinant of pursuit-induced MAE. Following oblique pursuit, we found MAE direction changes from oblique to vertical. Perceived MAE direction appears to be influenced by a subcortical mechanism as well, one based on the relative recovery rate of horizontal and vertical eye-movement processes recruited during oblique pursuit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16191625      PMCID: PMC1559950          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  42 in total

1.  Motion coherence affects human perception and pursuit similarly.

Authors:  B R Beutter; L S Stone
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.241

2.  Cerebellar flocculus and paraflocculus Purkinje cell activity during circular pursuit in monkey.

Authors:  H C Leung; M Suh; R E Kettner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Directional organization of eye movement and visual signals in the floccular lobe of the monkey cerebellum.

Authors:  R J Krauzlis; S G Lisberger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Perceived head-centric speed is affected by both extra-retinal and retinal errors.

Authors:  T C Freeman; M S Banks
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  False perception of motion in a patient who cannot compensate for eye movements.

Authors:  T Haarmeier; P Thier; M Repnow; D Petersen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-10-23       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  A revised analysis of the role of efference in motion perception.

Authors:  R B Post; H W Leibowitz
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  The role of intervening patterns in the storage of the movement aftereffect.

Authors:  P Thompson; J Wright
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 8.  Slow eye movements.

Authors:  U J Ilg
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 11.685

9.  Phantom motion after effects--evidence of detectors for the analysis of optic flow.

Authors:  R J Snowden; A B Milne
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Difference between horizontal and vertical optokinetic nystagmus in cats at upright position.

Authors:  T Kitama; M Ishida; H Luan; T Kawasaki; Y Sato
Journal:  Jpn J Physiol       Date:  2001-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  Wohlgemuth was right: distracting attention from the adapting stimulus does not decrease the motion after-effect.

Authors:  Michael J Morgan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Saccadic compensation for reflexive optokinetic nystagmus just as good as compensation for volitional pursuit.

Authors:  James J Harrison; Tom C A Freeman; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.