Literature DB >> 22903792

"Grasping the grey": patient understanding and interpretation of an intermediate allele predictive test result for Huntington disease.

A Semaka1, L G Balneaves, M R Hayden.   

Abstract

Since the discovery of the genetic mutation underlying Huntington disease (HD) and the development of predictive testing, the genetics of HD has generally been described as straightforward; an individual receives either mutation-positive or negative predictive test results. However, in actuality, the genetics of HD is complex and a small proportion of individuals receive an unusual predictive test result called an intermediate allele (IA). Unlike mutation-positive or negative results, IAs confer uncertain clinical implications. While individuals with an IA will usually not develop HD, there remains an unknown risk for their children and future generations to develop the disorder. The purpose of this study was to explore how individuals understood and interpreted their IA result. Interviews were conducted with 29 individuals who received an IA result and 8 medical genetics service providers. Interviews were analyzed using the constant comparative method and the coding procedures of grounded theory. Many participants had difficulty "Grasping the Grey" (i.e. understanding and interpreting their IA results) and their family experience, beliefs, expectations, and genetic counseling influenced the degree of this struggle. The theoretical model developed informs clinical practice regarding IAs, ensuring that this unique subset of patients received appropriate education, support, and counseling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22903792     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-012-9533-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  39 in total

1.  The whole truth and nothing but the truth, but what is the truth?

Authors:  H M van den Boer-van den Berg; A A Maat-Kievit
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  New problems in testing for Huntington's disease: the issue of intermediate and reduced penetrance alleles.

Authors:  A Maat-Kievit; M Losekoot; H Van Den Boer-Van Den Berg; G J Van Ommen; M Niermeijer; M Breuning; A Tibben
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  The psychological dimension of informed consent: dissonance processes in genetic testing.

Authors:  Sonja Grover
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Young people's experiences of growing up in a family affected by Huntington's disease.

Authors:  K Forrest Keenan; Z Miedzybrodzka; E van Teijlingen; L McKee; S A Simpson
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  What's the message? Interpretation of an uninformative BRCA1/2 test result for women at risk of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Sandra van Dijk; Wilma Otten; Daniëlle R M Timmermans; Christi J van Asperen; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Aad Tibben; Martijn H Breuning; Job Kievit
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Technical standards and guidelines for Huntington disease testing.

Authors:  Nicholas T Potter; Elaine B Spector; Thomas W Prior
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Receiving inconclusive genetic test results: an interpretive description of the BRCA1/2 experience.

Authors:  Christine Maheu; Sally Thorne
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.228

8.  Molecular analysis of juvenile Huntington disease: the major influence on (CAG)n repeat length is the sex of the affected parent.

Authors:  H Telenius; H P Kremer; J Theilmann; S E Andrew; E Almqvist; M Anvret; C Greenberg; J Greenberg; G Lucotte; F Squitieri
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Huntington's disease as caused by 34 CAG repeats.

Authors:  Jürgen Andrich; Larissa Arning; Stefan Wieczorek; Peter H Kraus; Ralf Gold; Carsten Saft
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 10.338

10.  Genetic testing for women previously diagnosed with breast/ovarian cancer: examining the impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation searching.

Authors:  N Hallowell; C Foster; A Ardern-Jones; R Eeles; V Murday; M Watson
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2002
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing: a review.

Authors:  Z Lohn; S Adam; P H Birch; J M Friedman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Experiences and lessons learned by genetic counselors in returning secondary genetic findings to patients.

Authors:  Carly Rost; Karin M Dent; Jeffrey Botkin; Erin Rothwell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Knowledge of and interest in genetic results among Parkinson disease patients and caregivers.

Authors:  Karina Sakanaka; Cheryl H Waters; Oren A Levy; Elan D Louis; Wendy K Chung; Karen S Marder; Roy N Alcalay
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-06-09       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Women's experiences of participating in a prospective, longitudinal postpartum depression study: insights for perinatal mental health researchers.

Authors:  Heather J Andrighetti; Alicia Semaka; Jehannine C Austin
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 3.633

5.  "Nothing is absolute in life": understanding uncertainty in the context of psychiatric genetic counseling from the perspective of those with serious mental illness.

Authors:  Catriona Hippman; Zoe Lohn; Andrea Ringrose; Angela Inglis; Joanna Cheek; Jehannine C Austin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  "Something Extra on Chromosome 5": Parents' Understanding of Positive Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) Results.

Authors:  Sarah A Walser; Allison Werner-Lin; Amita Russell; Ronald J Wapner; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: The Process of Parental Adaptation and Implications for Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Heather Andrighetti; Alicia Semaka; S Evelyn Stewart; Cheryl Shuman; Robin Hayeems; Jehannine Austin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Teenagers and Precision Psychiatry: A Window of Opportunity.

Authors:  Maya Sabatello; Ying Chen; Carmen Fiorella Herrera; Erika Brockhoff; Jehannine Austin; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 9.  Social and behavioral research in genomic sequencing: approaches from the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium Outcomes and Measures Working Group.

Authors:  Stacy W Gray; Yolanda Martins; Lindsay Z Feuerman; Barbara A Bernhardt; Barbara B Biesecker; Kurt D Christensen; Steven Joffe; Christine Rini; David Veenstra; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Clinical and psychological outcomes of receiving a variant of uncertain significance from multigene panel testing or genomic sequencing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chloe Mighton; Salma Shickh; Elizabeth Uleryk; Petros Pechlivanoglou; Yvonne Bombard
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 8.822

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.